Laserfiche WebLink
• Granting a variance will not be detrimental to the public and surrounding <br />properties by not requiring full compliance with parking and landscaping. The <br />approval to allow a reduction in parking and landscaping requirement will not be <br />a detriment to the surrounding properties. Based on the parking analysis, adequate <br />parking will be provided and will not impact the surrounding environment. <br />D. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City; <br />The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the City's General Plan land <br />use designation for the area. <br />2. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental <br />Review No. 99-104, is hereby approved and adopted. <br />Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the Planning <br />Commission has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that <br />the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the <br />ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban <br />environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. <br />Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XN, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the <br />payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. <br />• 2. Variance No. 01-03 is hereby approved, subject to conditions, as set forth in Attachment <br />A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. <br />ADOPTED this 11th day of -Tune , 2001 by the following vote: <br />AYES: Commissioners Doughty, Leo, Mondo, Nalle, Verino (5) <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Cribb, Richardson (2) <br />ABSTENTIONS: None <br />ATTEST: <br />~_..~, <br />Rosa Barela <br />Secretary to the Planning Commission <br />r ~ <br />~_J <br />