|
<br />
<br /> ~`~II~.II ~m~
<br /> , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
<br /> ..............~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~L............._.
<br />
<br /> Bob Fish is a former Caltrans bridge engineer with extensive structural engineer-
<br /> - ~ ing experience, ranging from bridge and tunnel design to bridge engineering design
<br /> Bridges support and construction. He is acompany-wide resource for seismic analysis and
<br /> IIIIIIIIIII; lui° ~~li~ . II' . 'iii design, and has demonstrated expertise in designing with all major forms ofbuild-
<br /> ingmaterials, including reinforced and prestressed concrete, welded steel, timber,
<br /> BS/1981/Civil Engineering and masonry
<br /> PE/1985/California N o: 39540 Civil
<br /> ( )
<br /> SE/1993/California, No: 3674 (Structural)
<br /> _~'i' gym" Lead structural engineer.
<br /> II II I I I
<br /> The structure is a 3-span 454-ft long,102-ft wide CIP/PS box girder bridge
<br /> supported on high cantilever seat type abutments and 6-column bents. Both
<br /> abutments and bents are supported on driven steel piles.This project is currently
<br /> under design, and Robert is responsible for developing PS&E for the Structural
<br /> portions of the projects which include a number of temporary and permanent
<br /> MSE walls.
<br /> II
<br /> ~ II II ~ ~ II ~ ~ I ~I'
<br /> ~ , ~ Project manager coordinating the project team subconsultants for
<br /> surveying, geotechnical, civil, environmental and public outreach. Developing
<br /> crossing alternatives, working with stakeholders for approval of preferred
<br /> alternative, developing 30 percent-level design, producing the feasibility study
<br /> report.
<br /> I II Lead structural engineer on a new
<br />
<br /> bridge structure carrying First Street over Napa Creek and the U.S. Army Corps
<br /> of Engineers' future Napa Bypass. The new bridge will be athree-span, cast-
<br /> in-place prestressed, haunched box girder. The total length is 344 feet and the
<br /> approximate width is 64 feet. Foundations are designed to accommodate a deep
<br /> scour potential. Performed the analysis and design, and wrote the specifications
<br /> for the new bridge.
<br /> ~ I I r
<br /> I ~ III Y ~ II IIIIIIIWw I u~ur AS a
<br /> senior structural engineering manager, developed very detailed cost estimates
<br /> for three Caltrans projects prior to bid. The task order No.1 cost estimate ($52.6
<br /> million) was provided as part of a report "study of cost estimating," containing
<br /> detailed methodology and practices for developing quantities and cost estimates.
<br /> The report also provides an evaluation of "risk" (cost and project delay) associated
<br /> with each item in regards to bidding and construction. Caltrans will use the
<br /> report to augment and enhance their methodologies. The AECOM estimate was
<br /> within 2 percent of actual bid. Bid results are still pending for tasks 2 and 3,
<br /> which required similarly comprehensive and detailed cost estimates. AECOM was
<br /> retained by Caltrans Division of Structures (District 59) for contract No. 59A0481
<br /> to perform on-call structures project development for Caltrans projects within
<br /> Districts 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10. Under this contract, AECOM completed the first task
<br /> order assigned by Caltrans Program/Project & Resource Management. Work
<br /> included developing an extremely detailed cost estimate of a Caltrans project
<br /> prior to bid. The cost esti mate was provided as part of a report "Study of Cost
<br /> Estimating," which detailed AECOM methodology and practices for developing
<br /> both quantities and cost estimates.
<br /> , ~ ,I, II I., I i, ..i..I,.w. ; IIII'I ~~StructureTask Manager.The
<br /> -215, Segment 1 project consists of widening and reconstructing the existing
<br /> six-lane freeway to accommodate the addition of HOV and mixed-flow lanes, with
<br /> an ultimate 10-lane configuration.This includes new overcrossings and widened
<br /> undercrossings to accommodate the wider freeway design. Bob was responsible
<br /> for Type Selection, Independent Check, Seismic Analysis (including fault rupture),
<br /> project standard special provisions,and Plans, Specifications,andConstruction
<br /> Cost Estimates (PS&E).
<br /> a
<br />
<br /> i , II
<br /> II ~ ~ II x „N~~~ ~~~~~~~W ~ ~ ~ ~ III II I I
<br /> ~vird ~ ~ ~ L ~,~~„fii~ il,,,, „
<br /> ir~ ~ ~ .
<br />
|