My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-01-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
01/04/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-01-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:55:20 PM
Creation date
1/4/2011 12:28:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/4/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
546
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> DBA 2010-04 and SPR 2010-03 <br /> December 13, 2010 <br /> Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Existing Apart mts to the North-25 and 43 Macre Apartments W the South-W DUJacre <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Vliest side of Birch lookma south from slte West side of Birch looking north from sib <br /> <br /> The applicant is requesting an increase from seven DU per acre allowed under the current general <br /> plan land use designation to 15.5 DU per acre. For reference, a density of 21.78 DU per acre is <br /> allowed under the current zoning. A density of 15.5 DU per acre represents a mid-range density <br /> that is consistent with, and In many cases much less intense than the existing densities. As such, <br /> staff finds that the proposed density increase from the provision of the general plan win not cause <br /> an adverse impact to the neighborhood. More importantly, the scale and massing of the project <br /> will be consistent with the early 1900's building forms currently found on the block and throughout <br /> the neighborhood. <br /> As such, staff finds that the proposed density increase from the provision of the zoning will not <br /> cause an adverse impact to the neighborhood. Under State Law, in order to be eligible for this <br /> density increase, the applicant must provide a minimum of 10 percent of the units to low Income <br /> households. In this case, the applicant will be providing all units, or 100 percent of the proposed <br /> development to a low income household, which is in excess of the minimum requirement. <br /> <br /> Deviation From Average Front Yard Setback <br /> <br /> The applicant is also requesting two deviations from the development standards to facilitate the <br /> construction of the affordable units. The first deviation pertains to the front yard setback. The SD- <br /> 40 standards require a minimum front yard of 20 feet, with an average setback requirement based <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 39C-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.