My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/13/2010
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
12/13/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:57:11 PM
Creation date
1/25/2011 10:45:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Doc #
Mintues
Date
12/13/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Walters expressed similar concerns regarding the <br />inappropriateness of the project's density, as well as the potential for parking <br />impacts should the residents not use their garages. <br />Commissioner Betancourt stated her support of the project given the track record <br />of the developers and their history of correcting existing blighted conditions with <br />their projects. She stated that the quality of design was very high and that this <br />project's location was a good place to provide affordable housing and would not <br />• conflict with future development in the Museum District. <br />Commissioner Gartner stated that the project was well designed and that <br />developing the vacant parcel would help to eliminate blight in the neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Yrarrazaval noted that the property had previously been <br />purchased with funds required to be set aside by the Redevelopment Agency to <br />fund affordable housing projects and that the project meets this requirement. He <br />stated that, although the City had issued numerous RFP's over the years, this <br />project was the one which finally was able to succeed. He stated that, at five <br />units, the project is appropriate for the neighborhood and for the site. <br />Commissioner Alderete pointed out that the neighborhood was zoned for and <br />contained multi-family residential projects, therefore the proposed project was not <br />incompatible with the existing neighborhood. He noted that the developer had <br />provided more parking per unit than was required by code in order to address the <br />neighborhood's concerns about parking impacts. He stated that the architectural <br />design would help to beautify the neighborhood and that the project meets the <br />City's requirement to provide affordable housing. <br />MOTION: Adopt a resolution approving deviations from the Two-Story Residence <br />(R2) development standards contained in Section 41-248 et seq. of the Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code (SAMC) as allowed by SAMC Section 41-608 and the State of <br />California Government Code Section 65915-65918 as an incentive to affordable <br />housing production. <br />MOTION: Gartner <br />VOTE: AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />ABSENT: <br />SECOND: Betancourt <br />Alderete, Betancourt, Gartner, Yrarrazaval (4) <br />Acosta, Walters (2) <br />None (0) <br />Turner (1) <br />5. DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION NO. 2010-03 AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. <br />2010-02 <br />Filed by Orange Housing Development Corporation and C & C Development <br />requesting to allow afive-unit residential development at 217 & 219 South Birch <br />Street located in the Specific Development No. 40 (SD-40) zoning district. <br />PUBLISHED IN THE ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER: December 1, 2010 <br />PUBLICLY NOTICED: December 1, 2010 <br />• RECOMMENDATION: <br />1. Adopt a resolution approving deviations from the Specific Development <br />No. 40 (SD-40) zoning district, as allowed by the Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code Section 41-1606 and the State of California Government Code <br />Section 65915-65918 as an incentive to affordable housing production. <br />2. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2010-03 as <br />conditioned. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 December 13, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.