My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/23/1996
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
09/23/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:40 PM
Creation date
1/27/2011 10:31:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/23/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. View indicated that he believed Mr. Moreno would qualify for a <br />rehabilitation loan- HnWPVa_r. he Waw not aware of Mr_ Mnrcnn~a f:nann: al <br />Mr. View indicated that he believed Mr. Moreno would qualify for a <br />rehabilitation loan. However, he was not aware of Mr. Moreno's financial <br />reaponaibilit ies. <br />Commissioner Pedroza indicated that she was not in opposition with the <br />neighborhood but she had hoped to come to a midway point of agreement. <br />Commissioner Segura indicated that she had requested the reconsideration to <br />receive more information from Mr. Moreno and to determine how feasible the <br />request was for the wood siding. <br />Commissioner Doughty stated that when Mr. Moreno came before the Commission, <br />he was aware of the requirements. She also noted that from a real estate <br />prospective, the wood aiding would increase the value of the home as well ae <br />' improve the appearance. <br />After further discussion, Commissioner Doughty moved to deny the request to <br />revise the plans for Historical Project Review No. 95-01. The motion was <br />seconded by Commissioner Oliver. <br />AYES: Brown, Nalle, Oliver, and Doughty <br />NOES: Pedroza and Segura <br />ABSENT: Mondo <br />F. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 96-OS (Bill Apple) <br />Filed by the City of Santa Ana to change the definition of a development <br />project and establish criteria for which development project will require <br />project review. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Recommend that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 96-OB. <br />Mr. View indicated that the ordinance was created at City Council's direction <br />to establish which development projects would require staff review through <br />the Division's project review process as well as examine the possibility of <br />reducing the number of projects that would require project review. <br />Mr. View discussed the proposed projects requiring project review and in <br />addition discussed the projects exempt from project review. He also noted <br />that the staff report did not reflect it; but staff was proposing alcoholic <br />beverage licenses as well as after hour operations to be exempt from project <br />review and only be reviewed by the Planning Division and Police Department. <br />Commissioner Nalle moved to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 96-08. <br />The motion was seconded by Commissioner Doughty. <br />AYES: Brown, Nalle, Oliver, Doughty, Pedroza and Segura <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Mondo <br />G. Comments from the Executive Director. (Robyn Uptegraff) <br />Ms. Uptegraff had no comments. <br />H. Comments from the Planaing Manager. (Kenneth Adams) <br />Mr. View provided an update regarding the wireless subcommittee group. He <br />indicated that the subcommittee had conducted one meeting and discussed the <br />sizes of monopoles, stealthing, and other key issues. At the next meeting, <br />a model ordinance would be discussed and in the near future the subcommittee <br />group would meet with Dan Young and LA Cellular. <br />Commissioner Oliver asked if it would be to the City's advantage to own and <br />operate the poles and possibly have the ability to lease the poles. <br />Mr. View indicated that the subcommittee would also be reviewing and <br />addressing that issue. <br />Mr. Adams indicated that Commission Segura had indicated that she would not <br />be able to attend the Saturday work session scheduled on October 26, 1996 and <br />requested to meet on another date such as November 9. <br />' Ms. Uptegraff also noted that this would be the last Planning Commission <br />meeting that Richard Lay would attend because he would be retiring. <br />I. Comments from the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Oliver reported that the traffic on north Bristol, north of <br />Memory Lane, was extremely heavy. He suggested a progressive left turn lane <br />for the area and requested the Public Works Agency to look into the issue <br />further. <br />J. Recess. <br />The afternoon session recessed at 7:10 p.m. <br />PLANNING COMMLSSION MINUTES 2 SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.