My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/09/1996
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
09/09/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:40 PM
Creation date
1/27/2011 10:32:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/9/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Vince Fregoso, Associate Planner, provided a brief presentation and indicated <br />that staff was requesting to begin revocation proceedings for the conditional use <br />permit for the Roxbury South nightclub due to noncompliance with the regulations <br />and conditions of approval. <br />Mr. Fregoso further indicated that the Commission previously continued the <br />revocation proceedings at the request of the applicant on July 22, 1996 to allow <br />additional time to address staff's issues of concern. City staff had conducted <br />several investigations of the nightclub and during the investigations it appeared <br />as though the applicant/owner made little or no effort to come into compliance <br />or address the concerns raised by staff. Staff was again requesting the <br />Commission to proceed with the revocation process. <br />Commissioner Doughty expressed her disapproval of the process which allowed <br />business owners the ability operate businesses while neglecting the laws while <br />continuing profit financially. She informed staff that she would like staff to <br />develop a procedure or process which would allow a fine to be implemented. <br />Mr. Kenneth Adams, Planning Manager, indicated that fines would have to be <br />legally incorporated into the City's approval process. <br />Ms. Robyn Upteqraff, Executive Director, added that if the Commission chose to <br />revoke the conditional use permit, a fine could occur. If the code were amended <br />to do so. <br />Mr. Allen Blume, representing the applicant, indicated that he understood staff's <br />concerns and stated that the restaurant had been recently closed down because the <br />applicant believed the facility needed a fresh start with new employees and <br />management in order to effectively rectify the problems. <br />Commissioner Nalle asked who the primary share holder was for the business; who <br />was the applicant for the project; and who was operating the business. <br />Mr. Shillea responded that Nancy Clifford, his daughter was the primary <br />shareholder. She and his son-in-law were the operators of the business. <br />Ms. Yolanda Pena, Police Department, indicated that New York Gourmet Corporation <br />is the applicant for the alcoholic beverage license (ABC). <br />Commissioner Mondo stated that when the request for Roxbury's first came before <br />the Commission several years ago, he supported the project and had high <br />aspirations for the project. However, within six months after the operations <br />began, the project began having problems. When the Commission met with the <br />applicant, it was agreed that Roxbury's would not be opened until the <br />improvements were made and in compliance with the code. Despite this promise by <br />Mr. Shillea, subsequent investigations showed the promises were not kept, and for <br />that reason he supports revocation of the conditional use permit. <br />Commissioner Doughty again expressed dissatisfaction with the operation of the <br />business as well as the City's policy which did not fine operators that ignored <br />the code requirements and laws. <br />Commissioner Pedroza indicated that she was not happy with the operations of the <br />business and expressed displeasure with the applicant wasting the time of both <br />the Commissioners and staff. She also reiterated to Mr. Shillea the he had <br />informed them that he would bring the site into compliance and it appeared that <br />he had not shown initiative to do so. <br />After further discussion, Madam Chair Brown stated that she felt that several <br />Planning Commissioners had extended themselves to conduct a site inspection. <br />During that inspection, staff had indicated all of the requirements and had <br />explained and identified all areas of the site that needed improvement. She <br />further expressed disappointment with the applicant's progress to conform to the <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner Mondo moved to direct staff to begin revocation proceedings for <br />Conditional Use Permit No. 92-23. The motion was seconded by Madam Chair Brown. <br />AYES: Brown, Nalle, Doughty, Mondo, and Pedroza <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Oliver and Segura <br />H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-16 (Vince Fregoso) <br />' To determine use for the Galaxy Concert Theatre located at 3503 South Harbor <br />Boulevard in the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. <br />Deternine that the dancing and nightclub use is not a permitted use under <br />Conditional Use Permit No. 94-16. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MAdil"1'ES 2 SEPTCMACR 9. 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.