Laserfiche WebLink
F. Annual Review of the National Sports Grill; Conditional Use Permit No. 94- <br />,n e..a ve..: s~..e u.. oe_a rtr: ....e c..e....e~, <br />F. Annual Review of the National Sports Grill; Conditional Use Permit No. 94- <br />10 and Variance No. 94-7. (Vince Fregoso) <br />RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the annual review staff report of <br />Conditional Use Permit No. 94-10 and Variance No. 94-7. <br />Mr. Vince Fregoso, Assistant Planner II, indicated the National Sports <br />Grill was before the Commission for it's annual review. He indicated the <br />National Sports Grill operates as a restaurant and sports entertainment <br />complex. Staff has been monitoring the complex carefully and to date <br />there have been 13 violations of conditions. Although these violations <br />are minor in nature, staff recommends the Commission review the project in <br />60 days. <br />Chairman Mondo asked if the ABC hearing had occurred. <br />Mr. Fregoso at ated yea. <br />Mr. Allen Fronke, National Sports Grill, indicated many of the violations <br />were in reference to security guards. He indicated the restaurant had <br />security guards on the premises but the guards were not licensed. They <br />have implemented a program to license the guards and the problem has been <br />addressed. The other violation involves the number of guards per guests. <br />Mr. Fronke indicated that the restaurant had underestimated the number of <br />visitors anticipated and that they acknowledged times in which they may <br />have been in technical violation of their conditional requirement. <br />Mr. Mike McCoy, Police Department, indicated there is to be one security <br />guard per 100 persons. The number ehouldnot be interpreted <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the Hutton Development owner coordinates with <br />the restaurant for security issues. <br />Mr. Fonke indicated no. The National Sports Grill has independently <br />provided security for the location. <br />Commissioner Pedroza asked how many persons have been over the occupancy <br />level. <br />Mr. McCoy indicated 150 to 250 people had been over the occupancy limit. <br />Inquiry regarding on-site security always relied on the valet as security. <br />Use of the valet for security purposes is not acceptable. <br />' Chairman Mondo asked if the current training program for security guards <br />in compliance with the City. <br />Mr. McCoy responded yes. <br />Commissioner Nalle moved to receive and file the annual review of the <br />National Sports Gri11; Conditional Use Permit No. 94-10 and Variance No. <br />94-7 and to have the item come before the Commission in 60 days. The <br />motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. <br />AYES: Mondo, Brown, Nalle, Pedroza, and Segura <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Doughty and Oliver <br />G. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 95-3 filed by the City of Santa Ana to <br />establish guidelines for potential conversions and enlargements of single <br />family housing units. (Kenneth Adams) <br />RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance <br />Amendment No. 95-3. <br />Mr. Kenneth Adams, Planning Manager, provided an overview of Zoning <br />Ordinance Amendment No. 95-3. He indicated this item is to provide policy <br />direction regarding expansions of single family dwelling units. For the <br />past eight years, staff has been discouraging the construction of <br />additions to unite which readily lend themselves to conversions. This <br />Zoning Ordinance Amendment will allow the Planning Manager on an <br />individual basis to deny or approve the requested expansions. However, <br />the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission for final <br />determination. <br />' Chairman Mondo asked why there was a need for an ordinance and could a <br />policy statement regarding the Commission's position of potential single <br />family conversions suffice. <br />Mr. Richard Lay, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the ordinance <br />addressing the issue would provide a stronger legal basis for staff <br />action. A written policy simply did not have the same legal status of an <br />adopted ordinance. <br />Commissioner Nalle moved to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 95-3. <br />The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. <br />AYES: Mondo, Brown, Nalle, Pedroza, and Segura <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Doughty and Oliver <br />2 <br />