My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/28/1998
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
09/28/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:28 PM
Creation date
1/27/2011 1:54:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/28/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 98-OS <br />F. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 98-OS <br />Filed by the City of Santa Ana to adopt citywide policies for exterior telephones requiring all exterior <br />telephones be permitted with a land use certificate. <br />(Continued by the Planning Commission September 14, 1998 to September 28, 1998) <br />LEGALLY NOTICED: August 30, 1998 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />' Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. <br />98-05. <br />Mr. Kenneth Adams, Planning Manager, indicated that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 98-05 had <br />been continued to address concerns regarding the required fees for the processing of the land use <br />certificates. Mr. Adams further stated that staff had revisited the processing fee of $150 and <br />recommended that the fee amount remain the same. However, staff would be willing to modify the <br />exemptions for the telephones that had obtained land use certificates and those that were in <br />compliance within a three year window period. In addition, he stated that staff would not support <br />exposed conduit and would continue to recommend only allowing six inches of conduit for the <br />telephones. <br />Commissioner Mondo asked if staff was recommending that each pay phone location be required to <br />pay a $150 fee. <br />Mc Adams responded that the cost of a land use certificate for each telephone would be $150. <br />Mr. Tom Webber, representing Pacific Bell, thanked staff for the recommendation of a three yeaz <br />window to bring a telephone into compliance, but reiterated his concern regarding requiring a $150 <br />fee and the recommendation to only allow six inches of conduit. In addition, Mr. Webber, displayed <br />some examples of payphone to illustrate the need for the allowance of additional conduit. <br />After further discussions regarding the amount of payphones permitted at locations, Federal <br />' Communication regulations, and whom staff would hold accountable for the maintenance of the <br />telephones, Commissioner Nalle moved to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 98-OS to <br />October 26, 1998. <br />The Commission further requested staff to address only imposing a fee per the location rather than <br />per telephone and to provide a survey to the Commission indicating an average of conduit per pay <br />phone in the City. <br />Motion to continue Zoning Ordinance to October 26, 1998. <br />MOTION: Nalle SECOND: Mondo <br />Ms. Uptegraff asked if the Commission would consider continuing Zoning Ordinance Amendment <br />No. 98-05 to October 12, 1998 instead of October 26, 1998. <br />Commissioner Solorio also requested that staff provide a chart of how other cities were regulating <br />their payphones and whether or not advertisements were allowed on the side panels of the telephones. <br />Ms. Uptegraff mentioned to the Commission that many cities had not established criteria to regulate <br />pay phones and that Santa Ana was taking the lead to set a precedent. <br />Motion to continue Zoning Ordinance No. 98-OS to October 12, 1998. <br />ii <br />MOTION: Nalle <br />SECOND: Mondo <br />AYES: Verino, MacDowell, Mondo, Doughty, Nalle, and Cribb <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Doughty <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />PUNNING COMMI8510N MINUTES 3 <br />Sep~ember 28, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.