07/14/1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Several Commissioners expressed concern regazding the conditions of approval related to landscaping ....d ....L..A L..... .....LC .......Id ..,i,i-...... ~,.~ ,...~~1L~__ ~_ .___~_t_._ __-_v _.___ 3 Several Commissioners expressed concern regazding the conditions of approval related to landscaping and asked how staff would address non compliance or incomplete compliance with the landscaping at the site. Mr. Adams indicated that there would be a six month review and if the condition had not been completed, the Commission could take the necessazy action to revoke the conditional use permit. After further discussion, the Commission directed staff to provide the applicant with an additional plan indicating the azeas on the site that needed landscaping and to ensure that the applicant understood what was necessary for compliance with the condition of approval related to landscaping, and to make cleaz it was the applicant's duty, not the landlord's to comply with the conditions. MOTION: Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 97-14 as conditioned. 1997. MOTION: Doughty SECOND: Verino AYES: Nalle, Oliver, Mondo, Doughty, Verino, Hanna, and MacDowell NOES: None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-32 (Larry Yenglin) Filed by the City of Santa Ana to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 96-32 allowing a rock crushing and material storage facility located at 4127 West MacArthur Boulevard in the Light Industrial (Ml) zoning district. (Continued by the Planning Commission May 27, 1997 to June 9, 1997) 4. LEGAL NOTICE: May 14, 1997 PUBLIC NOTICED: May 15, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution revoking Conditional Use Permit No. 96-32. Mr. Yenglin submitted pictures of the site, presented the staff report, and provided an update as to the status of compliance of the conditions of approval. Ms. Tamaza Stein, Attorney representing the applicant, submitted an addendum, and discussed conditions of approval that the applicant believed had been completed. In addition, she indicated that staff had not provided any guidance or direction as to how the applicant could satisfy the condition related to asbestos sampling. MOTION: Corainue Conditional Use Permit No. 96-32 to August 25, 1997. MOTION: Mondo SECOND: Oliver AYES: Nalle, Oliver, Mondo, Doughty, Verino, Hanna, and MacDowell NOES: None ABSENT: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. (For matters not previously listed on the Agendal Mr. James Kendrick indicated that he was excited to learn of the construction proposal for the Shimizu site on Main Street and requested the Commission to require a quality project and not ' approve a Center such as the Center on Seventeenth site. In addition, he expressed concern with the City allowing the Hopkins Development company and warned staff and the Commission to be cautious in their dealings with the company. 5. EXCUSE OF ABSENCES. There were no absences. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 JULY la, 1997