11/27/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on Saturdays; 3) adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 00-26 with modifications to the conditions of approval requiring a study considering the impacts of dewaterfng for the hotel and prohibiting construction prior to 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays; and 4) adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 00-03. 3. MOTION: Nalle AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTION: SECOND: Mondo Mondo, Nalle, Doughty, Verino, and Cribb None Solorio and Richardson None G Filed by Ms. Pamela Sapetto to amend the General Plan designation from Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) to General Commercial (GC), to change the zoning district from Professional (P) to Community Commercial (C1) in order to establish a lodge at an existing structure with a reduction in parking requirements located at 1421 East Seventeenth Street. (Continued by the Planning Commission November 13, 2000 to November 27, 2000) PUBLISHED IN THE REGISTER LEGALLY NOTICED: RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council: November 3, 2000 October 29, 2000 Deny General Plan Amendment No. 00-06. 2. Deny Amendment Application No. 00-13. 3. Adopt a resolution denying Variance No. 00-23 as conditioned. 4. Adopt a resolution denying Conditional Use Permit No. 00-10 as conditioned. Several Commissioners asked if the parking issues had been resolved during the two week continuance. Mr. Tom Conrad, indicated that there were 46 parking spots available and referenced a letter from the adjacent property owner. Ms. Pamela Sappetto, representing the applicant, indicated that at its last meeting, the Planning Commission requested the applicant meet with the neighborhood and the applicant met with Mr. Winston Covington and provided him an overview of the project. Chairman Mondo stated that the public hearing had been opened and closed at the previous meeting, however, he would allow additional public comments and he re-opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Mr. Winston Covington, President of Portola Park Neighborhood Association, stated that he did have a late conversation with the representatives for the applicant; that he was opposed to the project; requested the Planning Commission deny the request; and he referenced several letters from residents in opposition to the project. He further commented that the Moose was a good applicant, however, he didn't believe the location was suited for the use and that everyone he spoke to located on 18`h Street was opposed to the project due to the potential impacts. The following public members spoke in opposition to the project and expressed concern regarding traffic, lighting, and the potential impacts to the area if the lodge was allowed: