My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/02/1999
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
09/02/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:22 PM
Creation date
1/27/2011 5:08:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/2/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTION MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING <br />ACTION MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />September 2, 1999 <br />~~ <br />L~ <br />CALLED TO ORDER Spurgeon Building <br />206 West Fourth Street, Fourth Floor <br />5:20 p.m. <br />ATTENDANCE Lynnette Verino <br />Glenn Mondo, Vice Chairman <br />Molly Doughty <br />Jose Solorio <br />Don Cribb <br />Robert Richardson, 6:10 <br />ABSENT Alexander Nalle, Pro Tem <br />STAFF PRESENT Robyn Uptegraff, Executive Director <br />Kenneth Adams, Planning Manager <br />Sharon 7ohnson, Recording Secretary <br />Christine Shaw, Assistant, Deputy City Attorney <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-22 <br />To review the conditional use permit for Taco Bell restaurant located at 1229 East Seventeenth Street. <br />u <br />POSTED: September 1, 1999 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Commission policy. <br />Ms. Robyn Uptegraff thanked the Commission for attending the special meeting on such short notice. She <br />apprised the Commission that the special meeting had been called to order for staff to receive direction from <br />the Commission as to how to handle cases when a building is able to be occupied but final details have not <br />been completed such as landscaping and irrigation. She further apprised the Commission that the case in hand <br />was the conditional use permit for the Taco Bell restaurant located at 1229 East Seventeenth Street. That the <br />case had been reviewed by the Commission to allow adrive-through at the proposed restaurant; the <br />Commission approved the request and conditioned the case to have a trellis at the site. <br />Staff had recently, administratively, approved occupancy of the restaurant with a $15,000 deposit from the <br />applicant, Mr. Dick Armstrong, and instructed him to apply for modifications to the conditions of approval to <br />the Planning Commission if he wished to modify the conditions of approval for the project, however, if the <br />applicant defaulted on the agreement, the deposit would be forfeited and deposited into the City fund. She <br />further stated that several Commissioners and Councilmembers had expressed concerned regarding the matter <br />so the meeting was called for the Commission to express themselves regarding the matter and she would <br />therefore make a decision regarding the matter based on their comments. <br />Mr. Dick Armstrong, applicant, thanked the Commission for their attendance at the special meeting. He stated <br />that the trellis had been put on the plans as an after-thought but when the final bids were received, it had been <br />decided not to construct the trellis at the restaurant, however due to an oversight by the architect, the trellis did <br />not get removed from the plans. During the Final inspection both he and the planner were surprised to discover <br />the trellis still being displayed on the plans. In addition, Mr. Armstrong further informed the Commission that <br />he would be willing to construct a trellis, however, he requested to use a different type of material for the <br />trellis that was more cost efficient to him and emphasized to the Commission the importance of opening the <br />store during the construction of the trellis. <br />The Commission unanimously expressed concem and their displeasure regarding the applicant not completing <br />the construction as approved; the amount of the deposit and agreed that the deposit should be a minimum of <br />three times the cost of the project in question. In addition, concern was expressed regarding allowing certain <br />projects to operate without all of the required permits and other projects being required to fu1S11 and obtain all <br />necessary permits and it was emphasized that the Commission as a Body needs to have consistency citywide, <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 2, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.