Laserfiche WebLink
changes to Chapter 30 and Chapter 41; reviewed the steps necessary to develop the <br />Broadway Historic District; and requested feedback from the Commission. Mr. View <br />commented that the HRC requested a special meeting to further discuss. <br />Commissioner Cribb noted he is pro-development and pro-restoration and would like to <br />achieve a meeting with both interests; added he feels it is totally applicable when it <br />comes to new construction and would like to look more carefully at other communities <br />where they have done things right; and noted this will ultimately have profound <br />implications on the community. <br />' Discussion ensued on examples of the need to receive HRC approval to demo property <br />and for exterior alterations to historic structures. <br />Mr. View noted that the HRC is looking to have authority for architecture only. <br />Vice Chair Nalle and Commissioner Leo voiced concern on proposed plan noting it <br />would be cumbersome for a developer to go through the process to create another layer <br />of bureaucracy and feels will scare businesses away from the downtown. <br />Commissioner Verino also noted her concern and requested a list of the historical <br />buildings on the register, how many are eligible with a breakdown on the number of <br />residential and business structures; added it will assist in determining where to go on <br />historic district; and noted it would detract from a business friendly atmosphere. <br />Commissioner Cribb noted the intention is to have an opportunity to preserve the <br />corridor and to make sure we do not lose quality in the particular district; noted the need <br />to look at other districts more carefully; and noted that historic districts are becoming <br />increasingly premium adding we need to be careful with the guidelines and not limit <br />creativity. <br />Chairman Mondo noted it is a worthy goal adding that historic structures are safe with <br />the question on how to handle in-fill and suggested to review the Midtown Plan to <br />' strengthen goal to preserve historical nature. <br />Ms. Nelson noted the importance of Chairman Mondo, Commissioner Richardson and <br />another representative from Commission to attend the HRG meeting to provide <br />feedback. <br />F. STUDY SESSION ON HOTEL STANDARDS <br />Jeff Rice noted that per Commission direction staff met with industry representatives to <br />discuss design standards for hotels/motels and long-term stay facilities and presented <br />revised standards as a result of these discussions. <br />Ann Ni, Associate Planner, reviewed the design and development standards for the <br />long-term stay business hotels and for hotels/motels highlighting the proposed standards <br />and the industry response. <br />Discussion ensued on the standards for the pedestrian walkways, kitchen sink with <br />disposal, meeting room size, lobby ceiling height limit, and restaurant. <br />Commissioner Cribb noted the need and demand for a restaurant in a hotel. <br />Pamela Sapetto suggested better language for the pedestrian walkways and to make <br />' clear ceiling heights for lobby and small board room. <br />David Rose, of Extended Stay America, noted he was glad to meet with staff; was <br />pleased with the majority of the changes most significantly in the amenities; and noted <br />concern on the requirement of a pool and spa adding they do not have any facilities with <br />both a pool and spa. <br />Mr. Rice noted that in addition to meeting with the industry, staff did investigate a full <br />spectrum of hotels traveling to various cities adding the facilities that had a stronger <br />presence had higher ceilings in the lobby and meeting rooms. Staff also lowered the <br />minimum ceiling height requirement from 15 feet to 12 feet. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 MAY 29, 2007 <br />