Laserfiche WebLink
Motion to recommend that the City Council: 1) approve and adopt the Negative <br />Declaration, Environmental Review No. 00-176; and 2) adopt an ordinance approving <br />Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 00-18. <br />MOTION: Cribb SECOND: Verino <br />AYES: Mondo, Verino, Doughty, Cribb, Leo <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Nalle, Richardson <br />' ABSENTIONS: None <br />3. VARIANCE NO.00-68 <br />(Continued from January 8, 2001) <br />Filed by C & C Signs to allow secondary signage; the height and size of signage to <br />exceed the maximum requirements; and a reduction in landscaping at the Superior <br />Super Warehouse located at 1720 East Seventeenth Street in the Arterial Commercial <br />(C5) zoning district. <br />PUBLISHED IN THE REGISTER: December 29, 2000 <br />PUBLICLY NOTICED: December 21, 2000 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Approve and certify the Negative Declaration for Environmental Review No. 00- <br />199. <br />2. Adopt a resolution approving Variance No. 00-68 as conditioned to allow relief <br />from Section 41-863(a) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. <br />3. Adopt a resolution denying Variance No. 00-68 to allow relief from Section 471- <br />862(b)(2) and 41-862(c)(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. <br />' Mr. Rice noted that the public hearing was held on January 22, 2001 and Commission <br />directed staff to coordinate a meeting between the property owner, Superior Market and <br />the adjacent Cabrillo Park Neighborhood Association. Verny Carvajal, Assistant Planner <br />II, met with the parties and they have reached an agreement and presented a letter to <br />Commission. <br />Tom Reiman and Nancy Christensen, representing the Cabrillo Park Homeowners <br />Association, noted they sent a letter dated February 9, 2001 and indicated they met with <br />representatives from Superior Market and are comfortable with the 15 foot monument <br />sign on 17`" Street, no signage on Cabrillo Park Drive, re-painting the side and back of <br />the building as well as the front ayellow/mustard shade. <br />Eric Nelson, representing the property owner, noted the letter from the homeowners <br />reflects everything they had agreed upon. Mr. Nelson passed out a color rendering of <br />the sign they are proposing and noted they reduced their request of the variance from 20 <br />feet to 15 feet. Mr. Nelson also noted that they would like to remove item no. 3 from <br />their request which is the landscape set-back variance. Mr. Nelson then passed out a <br />color board and noted the mustard/ yellow color marked #109 will be the shade of paint <br />for the exterior. <br />Chairman Mondo reopened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. <br />Ms. Christensen stressed she wanted to make sure that signage is eliminated on <br />Cabrillo Park Drive and that the color on the sides and back of the building be the light <br />grey similar to Vista Paint silver pearl No. 582 and that the doors and trim be painted a <br />shade darker. Ms. Christensen further commented that the property owners have been <br />very helpful. <br />Mr. Nelson noted his appreciation to the neighborhood association, indicated their <br />request was reasonable as it is similar to the Osh property signage located at 17`" & <br />Tustin, and requested that 4 tenants be allowed on the monument sign. <br />