Laserfiche WebLink
B. COMMISSION SECRETARY REPORT <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Instruct the Commission Secretary to enter into the minutes that pursuant to the <br />Brown Act, the August 2, 2007 Agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on the <br />door of the City Hall Council Chambers at 22 Civic Center Plaza on July 26, 2007 at <br />3:18 p.m. <br />C. HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT NO. 2007-04 <br />Filed by the City of Santa Ana to execute an agreement with Eric and Lynn <br />Renezeder for the structure at 2357 North Riverside Drive (Warner House). <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Recommend that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize <br />the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Eric and <br />Lynn Renezeder for the structure at 2357 North Riverside Drive (Warner House), <br />Santa Ana, CA 92706. <br />D. HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT NO. 2007-05 <br />Filed by the City of Santa Ana to execute an agreement with Mark Rothenberg and <br />Lauren Tarkow for the structure at 2415 North Poinsettia Street (Dixon House). <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Recommend that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize <br />the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Mark <br />Rothenberg and Lauren Tarkow for the structure at 2415 North Poinsettia Street <br />(Dixon House), Santa Ana, CA 92706. <br />* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR <br />BUSINESS CALENDAR <br />E. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATION DISCLOSU~2E (REGARDING AGENDIZED <br />PROJECTSI <br />There were no disclosures from Commissioners. <br />Ms. Otto noted each Commissioner should have conflict radius maps in the back of <br />their binders for each real property or business owned in the city. If they need to <br />provide additional addresses, please relay to Mr. Klotz. <br />WORK STUDY SESSION <br />F. DISCUSSION OF COMMERCIAL SIGNS ON HISTORIC BUILDINGS <br />Hally Soboleske, Associate Planner, provided a presentation on new signage on <br />historic commercial buildings. Ms. Soboleske discussed the Downtown Sign <br />' Evaluation study performed by Joseph Musil which showed positives and negatives <br />of the Downtown signage including: lack of cohesion or commonality, unkept <br />awnings and busy signage, lack of identifying signage on historic buildings, and <br />period appropriate signs on few buildings. She discussed the historic marker <br />program noting approximately 16 buildings in the Downtown have historic markers, <br />noted in summary future signage should reflect period from 1920's through 1940's <br />which would then create a more cohesive design in this specific area, the facade <br />improvement and general up-keep is necessary, and that the name of the historical <br />building could be identified with signage. Ms. Soboleske noted the Renaissance <br />Specific Plan is still in formation and will include new sign code standards that will <br />replace the current Downtown Sign Code which the Commission should review by <br />HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES 2 SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 <br />