My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04 - HAADMIN PLAN 2
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Housing Authority (1999 - Present)
>
2010
>
12/20/2010
>
04 - HAADMIN PLAN 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:30:20 PM
Creation date
2/2/2011 2:09:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
04
Date
12/20/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If the HUD verification method for the indicator relies on data in the Form-50058 module <br />(formerly known as MTCS) in the PIH Information Center (PIC), and HUD determines that <br />those data are insufficient to verify SAHA's certification on the indicator due to SAHA's failure <br />to adequately report family data, HUD will assign a zero rating for the indicator [24 CFR 985.3]. <br />16-V.C. SEMAP INDICATORS [24 CFR 985.3 and form HUD-52648] <br />The table below lists each of the SEMAP indicators, contains a description of each indicator, and <br />explains the basis for points awarded under each indicator. <br />SEMAP Indicators <br />Indicator 1: Selection from the waiting list <br />Maximum Score: 15 <br />~ This indicator shows whether the PHA has written policies in its administrative plan for <br />selecting applicants from the waiting list and whether the PHA follows these policies <br />when selecting applicants for admission from the waiting list. <br />~ Points are based on the percent of families that are selected from the waiting list in <br />accordance with the PHA's written policies, according to the PHA's quality control <br />sample. <br />Indicator 2: Rent reasonableness <br />Maximum Score: 20 <br />~ This indicator shows whether the PHA has and implements a reasonable written method <br />to determine and document for each unit leased that the rent to owner is reasonable <br />based on current rents for comparable unassisted units <br />~ Points are based on the percent of units for which the PHA follows its written method to <br />determine reasonable rent and has documented its determination that the rent to owner is <br />reasonable, according to the PHA's quality control sample. <br />Indicator 3: Determination of adjusted income <br />Maximum Score: 20 <br />~ This indicator measures whether the PHA verifies and correctly determines adjusted <br />income for each assisted family, and where applicable, uses the appropriate utility <br />allowances for the unit leased in determining the gross rent. <br />~ Points are based on the percent of files that are calculated and verified correctly, <br />according to the PHA's quality control sample. <br />Indicator 4: Utility allowance schedule <br />Maximum Score: 5 <br />~ This indicator shows whether the PHA maintains an up-to-date utility allowance <br />schedule. <br />~ Points are based on whether the PHA has reviewed the utility allowance schedule and <br />adjusted it when required, according to the PHA's certification. <br />Indicator 5: HQS quality control inspections <br />Maximum Score: 5 <br />~ This indicator shows whether a PHA su ervisor reins ects a sam le of units under <br />iii29iio Page 16-21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.