My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/07/2006
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Historic Resources Commission
>
2006
>
09/07/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:53 PM
Creation date
2/2/2011 3:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/7/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WORK STUDY SESSION <br />WORK STUDY SESSION <br />D. DISCUSSION OF WEST-END LOFTS AT 320 WEST FOURTH STREET <br />Commissioner Macres left the conference room during the discussion. <br />Associate Planner Holly Soboleske gave an overview of the West End Lofts <br />project. She reviewed the items within the Historic Register District, six story <br />structure proposed, retaillgallery at ground flo r, five condominium units, <br />courtyard area highlighting historic ghost sign, and wilding heights. <br />Two issues of concern are the architectural compatibility and the building heights. <br />Ms. Soboleske discussed the exterior materials, architectural style, building <br />rhythm and Downtown design guidelines (infill with adjacent buildings). <br />Mr. Trevino clarified the zoning concepts; project has been underway for some <br />time thus the guidelines are applicable since the time of the application. <br />Commissioner Chinn expressed concern regarding the lot depth, height of <br />buildings along Fourth Street, blank-wall design of building, and the infill in the <br />historical area. Commissioner Seeley supported direction of urban development <br />with this project. <br />Ronald Nestor, AIA, with Nestor & Gaffney Architects discussed the elevations <br />for the structure, fenestration pattern, comparison samples of other urban density <br />projects that blend harmoniously with the historic nature of the district. <br />Pam O'Connor, Architectural Historian at Kaplan Chen Kaplan, prepared an <br />architectural study. She discussed the context of historic district and the essence <br />of the National Register District nomination. She pointed out that downtown has a <br />variety of building heights. The historic ghost sign poses challenges with regards <br />to building form. The Secretary of Interior Standards requires that infill cannot <br />mimic the 1920 buildings. New construction should be neutral. <br />Mr. Nestor commented on the colors and materials for the proposed buildings. <br />Mr. DiRienzo commented that the site has been vacant for approximately 40 <br />years. He wishes to help revitalize the area with an iconic building that is <br />compatible with the west-end theater. He noted that the project must also be <br />economically feasible. <br />Commissioner Bustamante agreed it best not to mimic the past, but rather to <br />introduce contemporary architecture. He recommended a more decorative <br />cornice such as that of the historic First National Bank. <br />Commissioner Lutz commented that part of the history of the downtown area <br />includes the evolution of the buildings, especially after the 1933 Long Beach <br />earthquake. <br />Commissioner Seeley commented regarding the need for visual interest and <br />"exclamation points" to breakup design. <br />Commissioner O'Callaghan expressed appreciation of the efforts of neutrality, <br />however he also noted concern for the massing and scale of the proposed <br />building. <br />Commission Chair Cook-Gives noted the developer's community involvement. He <br />expressed support for mixed-use in the downtown. He highlighted the need for <br />rhythmic compatibility at street level and the need to choose compatible materials <br />with surrounding structures. The project shows consistency at the pedestrian <br />scale. <br />E. Recess to Council Chambers (5:30 p.m.) <br />Commission Minutes 2 September 7, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.