My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/02/2006
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Historic Resources Commission
>
2006
>
02/02/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:51 PM
Creation date
2/2/2011 3:20:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/2/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Historic Commission will provide an informal review prior to Planning <br />Commission review. <br />Karen Haluza indicated changes for Chapters 30 and 41 of the Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code should be required. <br />Commission discussion ensued regarding the review process. Historic <br />Resources Commission consensually agreed to move forward with the proposal. <br />~. <br />Assistant Planner Pedro Guillen discussed the design guidelines and highlighted <br />the major points: <br />1. Preservation of structures within Heninger Park <br />2. Promoting the historical compatibility of building rehabilitation and <br />landscaping for existing structures within Heninger Park <br />3. Promoting the compatibility of new infill structures within the neighborhood <br />4. Establishing a process for review, allowing the Historic Commission to be the <br />sole responsible party for reviewing residences listed on the City Historic <br />Register <br />5. Zoning Ordinance Amendments required for: SD 40, Chapter 30, and <br />Chapter 41 <br />6. Planning Commission and City Council roles <br />Chairman Cook-Giles commented on the phrase "not recommended" that <br />appears throughout the document, and inquired as to how the Commission would <br />enforce. <br />Heninger Park Association Secretary, Ginelle Hardy spoke in favor of the <br />guidelines. She recommended an outlined "demolition process" be included; and <br />stated the front yard fence pictorials on page 46 were not applicable and should <br />be changed. <br />2. Public Comments (items not on the agenda) <br />Jeff Dickman <br />Commented on the Yale Apartments, indicated that the salvage work was <br />begun prior to consideration of historical preservation efforts. <br />Voiced concern with the new front door at the McNeill-Basler House that <br />changed the character of the structure; inquired if the City had any <br />jurisdiction to reinstate the old door. He commented that the applicant <br />continues do work without permits. <br />Ben Gabriel <br />• Commented on the developments for the One Broadway site, contends <br />the developer did work without permits. Inquired if there is an additional <br />fee when the developer circumvents the payment of fees. <br />• Inquired if there had been any consideration given to the Historic <br />Resources Commission's recommendation to salvage the Yale <br />Apartments. <br />Karen Haluza responded to the compliance on One Broadway, indicated that the <br />historical society issued a letter of concern regarding the Yale Apartments and <br />that Vince Fregoso is in the process of preparing a response to the conditions of <br />approval requiring compliance. <br />Historic Resources Commission Minutes 3 February 2, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.