My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/07/2002
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Historic Resources Commission
>
2002
>
02/07/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:59:05 PM
Creation date
2/3/2011 10:51:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/7/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WORK STUDY SESSION <br />B. HISTORIC REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM UPDATE <br />Continued item until March 7, 2002 meeting. <br />D. REVIEW OF ANNUAL OBJECTIVES <br />' Charles View, Planning Manager, presented an update of the objectives; the <br />Commission will discuss them next month. <br />Commissioner Giles requested that property owners be notified via both certified and <br />regular mail. After discussion, Charles View said Planning would do both. <br />Commissioners Chinn and Giles requested an update on plaques/awards. They were <br />advised that the budget for cultural information phases 1 (Downtown) and 2 (French <br />Park) had been funded. The Ad Hoc Committee will discuss the proposed text and <br />report back to the Commission. Another area for next year will be identified. <br />Madam Chair Kings noted some of the wording from Objective 12 regarding the Plaque <br />Program was missing, and Mr. View stated it would be inserted. <br />Commissioner Richardson, in reference to Objective 15, asked to explore how historical <br />buildings would be addressed in the aftermath of an earthquake and noted that <br />guidelines are available. <br />Madam Chair Kings agreed with Commissioner Richardson and added a future goal is <br />training building inspectors on policy with regard to historic buildings and demolitions. <br />The Commission should add these to their discussion of future goals. <br />' E. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORICALLY SENSITIVE {AREAS <br />Madame Chair Kings noted that the Commission is currently limited in their preservation <br />efforts to those structures/properties on the historical list. Many areas are not on the list, <br />as they were not considered threatened. Future areas to focus on and potential <br />historical districts need to be addressed. Boundaries and guidelines need to be <br />established for those areas. <br />Discussion followed. It was noted that unless a property is located within an SD, <br />Planning Counter staff could only encourage applicants to maintain the historical <br />features of the structure. h9ills Act benefits and requirements for historical designation <br />were discussed. <br />Madam Chair Kings noted the eight critical neighborhoods and areas for , ~ Ill~as <br />follows: <br />Logan Floral Park <br />Washington Square French Park <br />Heninger Park Eastside <br />Wilshire Square Park Santiago <br />v~~~~''~Wlllll~~N~lll~I~~IIII~i~~~III~I~~iII~N~~I °«~i~liil~l~i~'~1~q~~i~~~~~~„~r~~~ ;;fir ~j7as~f;'~:31~ <br />~~i~j~~~ <br />' Lacy Delhi <br /> Fisher Park Santa Ana Triangle <br /> French Court Flower Park <br /> Willard West Floral Park <br /> Pico Lowell South East Side <br />HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES - 2 FEBRUARY 7, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.