My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/14/2001
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Historic Resources Commission
>
2001
>
06/14/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
2/3/2011 11:02:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/14/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTION MINUTES OF THE <br />HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETIING <br />JUNE 14, 2001 <br />CALLED TO ORDER: 3:10 P.M. <br />City Hall Ross Annex <br />Second Floor Conference Room 2002 <br />20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California <br />ATTENDANCE: COMMISSIONERS Present: <br />Rose Anne Garcia Kings, Chair <br />Philip Chinn, Pro Tem <br />Carlos Bustamante <br />Rita Corpin <br />Blair O'Callaghan <br />Paula Rankin <br />COMMISSIONERS Absent: <br />Paul Giles, Vice Chairman <br />James Gartner <br />Robert Richardson <br />STAFF PRESENT: Cynthia J. Nelson, Deputy City Manager <br />Charles View, Planning Manager <br />Joseph Edwards, Principal Planner <br />Christopher Norman, Assistant City Attorney <br />' Maya DeRosa, Senior Planner <br />STUDY SESSION <br />A. Discussion of the Broadway Historic District <br />Madam Chair Kings opened the discussion providing background on historic preservation <br />measures currently in place. The two primazy objectives for creating historic districts <br />included: 1) the preservation of areas that have concentrations of historic structures; and <br />2) the preservation of setbacks and development standards that create character in an <br />area. <br />Charles View, Planning Manager, provided an overview o~Fthe current authority allowed <br />in the code; requested confirmation of the objectives of the Commission; and requested <br />discussion between the two Commissions. Mr. View highlighted that creating a historic <br />district under current code authority does not give the Historic Resources Commission <br />any more level of review. In terms of authority related to Specific Developments (SDs), <br />there is an additional review process and special review of architecture, which requires <br />Planning Commission approval. <br />Madam Chair Kings asked what was the current review process for buildings within <br />historic districts. Mr. View indicated that currently Section 30-6 of the code only allows <br />the Historic Resources Commission to review listed buildings within a district, not the <br />non-listed individual buildings. <br />Madam Chair Kings inquired if there was a contributing building in the Downtown <br />National Register District would it come to the Historic Resources Commission for <br />review. Mr. View responded that it would not if it was not on the Register. <br />Mr. Joseph Edwards, Principal Planner, provided a survey of how other cities utilize <br />historic districts noting that most cities aze interested in design review and architecture. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.