My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/07/2000
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Historic Resources Commission
>
2000
>
09/07/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:59:15 PM
Creation date
2/3/2011 11:14:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/7/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Kings asked if staff intended to verify the building names on the register <br />and noted some entries were incorrect; and commented that it would be helpful if the <br />list sorted properties by street addresses on the Register and noted that the historic <br />map legend had the structures listed by streets. <br />Ms. Marta Crane indicated that staff would continue to research and correct the <br />structure names on the Register. <br /> <br />Motion to adopt a resolution approving the amendment of the various discrepancies to <br />the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. <br />MOTION: Cribb <br />SECOND: Berry <br />AYES: Kings, Breves, Berry, Corpin, Cribb, Gartner, Giles, Chinn, <br />Bustamante <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTENTIONS: None <br />Comments <br />3. Orat Communications -Comments from the public. <br />(For matters not listed on the Agenda) <br />Mr. Ben Grapillo, property owner, commented that when he and others first learned of <br />the list they had some concerns regarding impacts to their property, however, most <br />owners are favorable to the list. <br />J <br />4. Comments from the Acting Executive Director. <br />Commissioner Kings informed Mr. Grapillo that one of the Commission's objectives was <br />to familiarize the public more of the benefits of structures being placed on the Register. <br />Mr. Kenneth Adams, apprised the Commission that Councilman Franklin had requested <br />a progress report on the Historic Resources Commission and staff would be preparing <br />the report in the near future. <br />5. Comments from staff. <br />Mr. Joseph Edwards, Principal Planner commented that: <br />• due to the conference in October, staff would be requesting adjournment to <br />Thursday, November 9, 2000 Commission meeting. <br />• staff would be conducting interviews for consultants and was anticipating <br />taking a recommendation to City Council in November. <br />6. Comments from the City Attorney. <br />' Ms. Cristine Shaw. Deputy City Attorney, clarified that a maker and a seconder of a <br />motion could vote against a motion. However, the maker of the motion could not <br />speak against the motion and the seconding of a motion was to allow discussion on <br />the item. In addition, she informed the Commission that all absences were unexcused <br />unless the Commission took an action to excuse the absences; that no motions were <br />needed if the absences were not going to be excused. <br />7. Comments from the Historic Resources Commission. <br />Commissioner Chinn <br />• commented that it was a great meeting. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.