Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />'J <br />n <br /> <br />11 <br />12. <br />13. <br />Public Comments (items not on the agenda) <br />Madam Chair Kings noted that she had received a lett~r from Catherine Cate regarding the <br />proposed Historic French Park Traffic Plan. Mr. Edw rds advised that the Environmental <br />Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC) was the reviewing body for traffic plans and that <br />any traffic related issues should be forwarded to them. <br />A letter had also been received from Jeff Dickman, Vice resident Historic French Park Board <br />of Directors, expressing concern that the issue had n t been placed on the June 6, 2002 <br />Historic Resources Commission Agenda. j <br />Catherine Cate, French Park resident, expressed ce <br />the neighborhood and requested that the Historic <br />since French Park is a Historic District. <br />Barry Jensen, French Park resident, requested that the <br />the issue as it impacts a historic resource. <br />Madam Chair Kings asked if the traffic count could chan~ <br />require review by the Commission. Kylee Odette, Del <br />issues were aesthetic the Commission could review thei <br />traffic issues, the Commissioners and the public shoulc <br />issues. Madam Chair Kings asked if protecting the res <br />Commission's review and Mr. Edwards responded that <br />brought before them. <br />Comments from Staff <br />Mr. Edwards <br />• Noted that the next Template Review Committ <br />June 14 at 4:30 p.m. <br />• Advised that draft language for the Historic PIS <br />be distributed to the Commission for comment. <br />• Recommended that the Commission forward a letter of support to ETAC. <br />regarding the impact of the traffic on <br />urce Commission review the issue <br />Resource Commission review <br />the use to Commercial which would <br />qty City Attorney, advised that if the <br />i. As ETAC is the reviewing body for <br />attend the meeting and address the <br />lential use would be an issue for the <br />t was an ETAC issue and should be <br />meeting would be held on Friday, <br />had been received and would <br />Commissioner Giles <br />• Asked if it would be appropriate for the Commi$sion to prepare a letter to ETAC <br />regarding the proposed French Park Traffic PI~'n. Ms. Odette responded that it <br />would be better to attend the meeting. ', <br />Asked why it was appropriate for the Commission to review the traffic impact that <br />would be created by the proposed One Broad~ay Plaza project. Mr. Edwards <br />responded that it was appropriate as certain pr posed traffic mitigations involved <br />the potential removal of historic structures. <br />Commissioner Chinn <br />• Noted that Washington Square, Floral Park, and Wilshire Square all have closed <br />off areas to traffic for quality of life issues. <br />Commissioner Richardson <br />• Noted that it appears that there is a differ nce of opinion regarding what <br />destruction of property is and that it could be ither loss of property or loss of <br />quality of life. He recommended that the Commi sion forward a letter of support to <br />ETAC. Mr. Edwards advised that he would co suit with Counsel regarding the <br />possibility of placing the item on the agend but that the public should be <br />encouraged to work with ETAC. <br />Commissioner Bustamante <br />s <br />