My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-02-22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
02/22/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-02-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 2:01:55 PM
Creation date
2/17/2011 1:18:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/22/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS <br />The response to this Request for Proposal should contain documentation of contractor's credentials and <br />expertise in this field. Consideration will be given to contractors with demonstrable and documented <br />experience in similar work. An evaluation committee will review the responses received and interview <br />the companies who submit the most responsive proposals. The following evaluation criteria and <br />weights will be used to evaluate the bids: <br />Capability and Experience of Contractor (25 %) <br />1. Ability of contractor and his/her ball diamond infield maintenance sub - contractor to obtain the <br />staff and equipment necessary to perform specifications as outlined in the contractor's business <br />plan <br />2. Ability to provide certified irrigation techs on this job. <br />3. Training and safety precautions taken to perform specifications <br />4. Experience of supervisory and management staff assigned to the contract <br />Past Performances (25 %) <br />1. Past record of performance on contracts of similar size and scope with Santa Ana or other <br />governmental agencies including such factors as reliability, adherence to specifications and <br />compliance with contract terms and conditions. <br />2. Past record of performance on requests for extra work, including ability to accurately bid jobs, <br />cost competitiveness, and quality of work <br />3. Acceptable, verifiable references and site reviews <br />Cost of Proposal (50 %) <br />1. Cost of base proposal <br />2. Cost of specialized services <br />FOLLOW -UP OF EVALUATION PROCESS BY CONTRACTOR <br />Contractors may follow up on the evaluation of the proposals by contacting Robert Carroll, via email <br />at rcarroll @santa- ana.org. <br />6 <br />19C -8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.