My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - ORDINANCE AMEND SAMC TELECOM FACILITIES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
03/21/2011
>
75A - PH - ORDINANCE AMEND SAMC TELECOM FACILITIES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:49:48 PM
Creation date
3/17/2011 1:23:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
3/21/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />H. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ? ? ? <br /> structures which would impede or redirect flood <br /> flows? <br />1. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ? ? ? J? <br /> loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including <br /> flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. <br />J. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ? ? ? <br />IX. Land Use and Planning - Would the project: <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ? ? ? <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ? ? ? <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br /> project (including, but not limited to the general <br /> plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br /> ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br /> mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ? ? ? <br /> plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Min eral Resources - Would the project: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ? ? ? <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and <br /> the residents of the state? <br />B. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br /> Mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br />75A-50
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.