Laserfiche WebLink
V. Cultural Resources <br />a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as <br />defined in Section 15064.5? <br />b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological <br />resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? <br />c) Would the project directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or <br />unique geological feature? <br />d) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside offormal cemeteries? <br />The FEIR Initial Study determined that, because the project site did not include cultural resources, no <br />impact would occur and no further analysis was required. The project is located in a substantially built- <br />out area of Santa Ana and the site was previously disturbed with grading and construction. No cultural <br />resources were identified and no changes have occurred. Therefore, the FEIR remains adequate and <br />complete with respect to cultural resources. <br />VI. Geology and Soils <br />a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the <br />risk of loss, injury or death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake <br />Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial <br />evidence of a known fault?(No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (No Substantial Change from Previous <br />Analysis) <br />iv) Landslides? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The FEIR included mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts from rupture, seismic ground <br />shaking, ground failure, liquefaction and/or landslides. No changes have occurred related to these <br />topics. Therefore, no additional analysis is required, and the FEIR remains adequate and complete. <br />b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (No Substantial Change <br />from Previous Analysis) <br />The FEIR included mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts related to soil erosion and the loss <br />of topsoil. Modifications to the condominium component of the project will have no new or more <br />severe impacts beyond those addressed and mitigated in the FEIR. Therefore, the FEIR remains <br />adequate and complete. <br />c) Be on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project <br />and potentially result in on- or off-.site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or <br />collapse? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The FEIR included mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts related to unstable soils. No <br />changes have occurred in this area form the analysis in the FEIR. No new or more severe impacts <br />beyond those addressed in the FEIR have occurred and, therefore, the FEIR remains adequate and <br />complete. <br />MacArthur Place South EIR - 2011 Addendum 26 <br />75B-71