My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-04-04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
04/04/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-04-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:48:18 PM
Creation date
3/31/2011 3:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/21/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
610
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
apartment complex is not in the best interest of Concord resident's health, safety and <br />welfare, quite the opposite. <br />Public Safety Issues: <br />A 41-unit apartment complex in the proposed location is a great public safety concern, <br />not only for the apartment complex tenants but for the neighborhood residents as well. <br />The developer's proposal to address this concern is a 6 foot iron-wrought fence along <br />the riverbed border. As it is, the riverbed (being county property) is not patrolled at all. <br />Neighborhood residents bordering the riverbed have constant problems with gangs and <br />transients - primary reason why residents along the riverbed have fences higher than <br />six feet tall. Adding a 41-unit apartment complex will provide a great opportunity for the <br />tenants to be victims of crime; easy access through the riverbed and easy escape. It's <br />inevitable that such problems will spread to the surrounding neighborhood and <br />obviously that a huge concern for our community. Again, we don't need the additional <br />targets of criminal activity in our neighborhood. <br />City Funding of Project: <br />My understanding in 2010 the Developer asked from the City and received $1.5 million <br />In HOME loans. However, the developer was unsuccessful in receiving low income tax <br />credits and now wants the City to lend it another $469,000, so as to "improve its <br />success" with another tax credit application. At a time when the City's workforce has <br />been slashed to a bare minimum (or less), how can the city be loaning money to a <br />developer so the it can "improve" it chances at getting low income tax credits - <br />especially to add an apartment complex to single family residence neighborhoodl While <br />1 understand it's a different "pot" from which the City makes these loans, it is still <br />incredible to believe the City would be funding the "destruction" one of its last remaining <br />single family residence neighborhoods! <br />If the City has such funds available, maybe the City should consider funding a <br />Community Center in that location. There are no community centers anywhere close to <br />Concord and the surrounding neighborhoods and there is definitely a need for one. <br />Instead, the City is looking to fund an apartment complex to be located at a prime <br />entryway to the City. <br />The Developer: <br />Prior to March 7, 2011, the last time the Developer had any contact with Concord as in <br />the summerof 2009. Contrary to the statement, in the Discussion section of the <br />Recommended Action before the Council, the Developer has NOT been working with <br />21 Page <br />CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 26 MARCH 21, 2011 <br />1 OA-26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.