My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AECOM 1 - 2011
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
>
AECOM 1 - 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 11:58:03 AM
Creation date
4/6/2011 11:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
AECOM
Contract #
A-2011-024
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
1/18/2011
Expiration Date
1/1/2013
Insurance Exp Date
4/1/2014
Destruction Year
2021
Notes
Amended by A-2011-024-01, -02, -03
Document Relationships
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1A - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1B - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1C - 2014
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AECOM <br />12 <br />Maintenance of Traffic During Construction/ <br />Construction Staging <br />The City has stated, and our study of the project has <br />reinforced, that the maintenance of traffic during <br />construction is very critical to the success of this project. <br />We have discussed previously in this proposal a potential <br />strategy to minimize the duration of traffic interference, <br />this beingthe roll in structure alternative for the bridge <br />superstructure, since the bridge can be manufactured onsite, <br />while traffic is still in its existing pattern. Only when the <br />new bridge is moved into its final location and during the <br />construction of the majority of the approach work, is there a <br />need to detour the traffic. We have included one possible plan <br />fortraffic handling and construction staging, and this plan <br />corresponds to this proposed construction scheme. Please <br />reference Figure 6. <br />Figure 6 shows utilizing the south side of Santa Ana <br />Boulevard for a detour road, beginning from the [insert detour <br />road photo sent earlier via email adjacent to this paragraph] <br />intersection with Santiago Street on the westerly limit of <br />the project, then turning southerly, before running parallel <br />to Santa Ana Boulevard, finally meeting the existing street <br />alignment and profile near the Fuller Street intersection. This <br />detour road is proposed to be two lanes in each direction. <br />Of course this reduction of the third lane in each direction <br />for the detour road would require the need for further <br />traffic studies to confirm the viability of this configuration <br />in terms of Level of Service (LOS) for both the road and the <br />intersections, and surrounding network of streets.The figure <br />shows the proposed first stage of the construction, during <br />which the majority of the improvements can be completed, <br />with only the south side (eastbound traffic direction) of Santa <br />Ana Boulevard, both at and near the west, and east, end <br />tie-ins to the existing alignment and profile needing to be <br />constructed. The next stage would shift traffic to north side <br />of the roadway, while completing the final work elements. <br />To evaluate the traffic impacts during construction, our <br />approach will look at several alternatives for traffic flow <br />through the project site, and impacts to the surrounding <br />street and freeway network, including: <br />The use of a reversible lane to address peak hour <br />traffic movements. A moveable barrier could be used <br />to provide three westbound lanes in the morning, and <br />three eastbound lanes in the evening. <br />Due to physical constraints at Fuller, consideration <br />might be given to a one-way couplet using Fruit Street <br />for eastbound traffic to Grand Avenue with westbound <br />traffic on Santa Ana Boulevard. This couplet would be <br />join together prior to Santiago Street. <br />Close evaluation of the 1-5 ramps for circulation will <br />also be a key component. With advance notification, <br />traffic utilizing the Grand Avenue exits may instead <br />use 17th Street and 4th Street with alternative routes, <br />further reducing the load on Santa Ana Boulevard <br />during construction. <br />which had an ADT of over 44,000 vehicles per day <br />The RFP mentions the possible need for temporarily locating <br />the railroad operations onto shoofty tracks. This would <br />be necessary for all other strategies for constructing the <br />underpass bridge structure. We have included Figure 7 and <br />this figure shows one possible plan for the alignment of the <br />shoofly tracks, this being easterly of the existing alignment, <br />beginningjust southerly of the 1-5 crossing, turning easterly <br />and then running parallel to the existing tracks until well <br />southerly of the station, and then turning easterly to join <br />the existing track alignments. The RFP also mentions <br />the importance of the shoofly alignments to utilize the <br />station platforms. This alignment achieves that need, with <br />passengers being able to access the westerly track from <br />the existing platform, with a temporary, probably asphalt <br />concrete, platform, which can be constructed for access to <br />the easterly track. An SCRRA Standard Pedestrian Crossing <br />would be required at both ends of the platform to cross the <br />shoofly tracks for access to the easterly track. <br />Metrolink station platform for the rail shoofly tracks <br />Proposal for Protect Study Report Equivalent and Conceptual Engineering Plans for <br />Santa Ana Bcutevard Grade Separation Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.