|
® AECOM
<br />the potential for Burrowing Owl (Athene
<br />cunicularia) to occur. All areas to be evaluated
<br />will be examined carefully for habitat
<br />characteristics and disturbance factors. The
<br />study area for this work is assumed to be the
<br />proposed project footprint and a 100 -foot
<br />buffer, as accessible to ICF Jones & Stokes. An
<br />additional 400 -foot buffer beyond the 100 -foot
<br />buffer will be visually assessed only. This
<br />scope and cost assume that the City or AECOM
<br />will be responsible for providing access.
<br />Potentially suitable habitat will be mapped. No
<br />permits are required to perform a habitat
<br />evaluation, but the biologist must be
<br />experienced with the species' biology,
<br />identification of direct and indirect sign, and
<br />physical characteristics of potentially suitable
<br />habitat. Habitat evaluations for this species
<br />can be performed anytime of year. The results
<br />will be directly incorporated into the NES/MI.
<br />This scope of work assumes that a focused
<br />survey for burrowing owl will not be required.
<br />• Jurisdictional Waters Delineation — A qualified
<br />biologist will examine all relevant portions of
<br />the site and perform a routine -level delineation
<br />of the extent of potentially jurisdictional waters
<br />under both state and federal regulations. The
<br />following field evaluations will be performed,
<br />however, it is assumed that no jurisdictional
<br />resources will be identified. Evaluation for
<br />federal wetlands will follow the applicable
<br />methods in the 1987 manual from the Corps of
<br />Engineers, the 2006 Arid West supplement from
<br />the Corps of Engineers, and the Rapanos
<br />Guidance (2007), along with subsequent
<br />supporting materials and applicable
<br />regulations, policy, and case law. The study
<br />area for this work will include the proposed
<br />project footprint along with a 50 -foot buffer.
<br />This scope and cost assume that the City or
<br />AECOM will be responsible for providing
<br />access. The work will be at a routine (rather
<br />than comprehensive) level of detail, that is,
<br />point sampling and standard criteria
<br />(hydrology, soils, and vegetation) will be used
<br />to identify, map and calculate total area for
<br />federal and state jurisdiction, but no laboratory
<br />testing of soils or water, no hydrological or
<br />hydrogeomorphic analysis or modeling, no
<br />formal statistical analysis, and no extensive
<br />records searching, will be provided. Evaluation
<br />of existing functions and values for
<br />jurisdictional areas will be addressed at a
<br />qualitative level. Mapping will be performed at
<br />a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet (1:2400) or
<br />better, with a minimum mapping unit of no
<br />more than 0.05 acres, and will reflect the
<br />delineated boundaries of any jurisdictional
<br />waters and wetlands present. Photographs
<br />representative of relevant site conditions will
<br />tProposal `or Project Study Report Equivalent and Co
<br />Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
<br />be taken. As noted, it is assumed that no
<br />jurisdictional waters or wetlands will be
<br />identified and no Jurisdictional Delineation
<br />Report will be required.
<br />Technical Report Preparation
<br />A draft NES/MI will be developed based on results of the
<br />biological surveys and analysis and will conform to the
<br />current Caltrans NES/MI annotated outline, as
<br />previously described. The report will describe:
<br />• The study methods used in identifying and
<br />assessing the biological resources at the
<br />project site, the personnel who conducted the
<br />studies, contacts made with agencies, and any
<br />limitations associated with the study;
<br />• The environmental setting including both the
<br />biological and physical setting at the project
<br />site;
<br />• (The results, including special -status species
<br />present on the site, if any, and a discussion of
<br />impacts and mitigation, as necessary; and
<br />• The appropriate regulatory requirements and
<br />necessary permits, if any.
<br />At this time it is assumed that jurisdictional waters will
<br />not be impacted and permitting (i.e., Section 401 Water
<br />Quality Certification, Section 404 permit, or Section
<br />1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement) would not be
<br />required. Therefore, the processing of permits are not
<br />included in this scope of work. If based on the field
<br />work performed it is determined that these permits
<br />would be required then a scope and cost for the
<br />preparation and processing of these permits can be
<br />provided by ICF Jones & Stokes if desired by the City
<br />and AECOM.
<br />Community Impact Assessment
<br />ICF Jones & Stokes will prepare a Community Impact
<br />Assessment. ICF Jones & Stokes will identify the
<br />community impacts on neighborhoods, businesses, and
<br />minority and low-income populations, as well as the
<br />project's consistency/compatibility with the existing
<br />and future land uses and plans in the area. The
<br />community impact analysis will be prepared in
<br />accordance with Caltrans Environmental Handbook
<br />Volume 4: Community Impact Assessment. Topics to be
<br />addressed in the community impact analysis will
<br />include social impacts, economic impacts (change in
<br />employment and tax base changes), land use/growth
<br />(consistency with local plans, development
<br />opportunities), farmland, and public services impacts
<br />(accessibility and parking, utilities).
<br />The community impact assessment considers how the
<br />proposed project activity would affect the people,
<br />institutions, neighborhoods, communities,
<br />organizations, and larger social and economic systems.
<br />The community impact analysis will provide a clear
<br />description of the existing conditions, the potential
<br />impacts of the project on the community and how the
<br />nceptual Engineering Plans for
<br />
|