My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AECOM 1 - 2011
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
>
AECOM 1 - 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 11:58:03 AM
Creation date
4/6/2011 11:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
AECOM
Contract #
A-2011-024
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
1/18/2011
Expiration Date
1/1/2013
Insurance Exp Date
4/1/2014
Destruction Year
2021
Notes
Amended by A-2011-024-01, -02, -03
Document Relationships
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1A - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1B - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1C - 2014
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E AECOM <br />Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A <br />quantification of operational -period greenhouse gas <br />(GHG) emissions associated with implementation of the <br />proposed project will be conducted. Consistent with <br />current Caltrans policy, construction -period GHG <br />emissions will not be quantified. Operations -period <br />GHG emissions will be quantified using regional daily <br />peak -period and non -peak -period vehicle miles traveled <br />(VMT) apportioned into 5 mph speed bins for speeds <br />between 5 mph and 75 mph; and the CT-EMFAC <br />emissions model. ICF Jones & Stokes will present a <br />comparison of GHG emissions associated with the Build <br />Alternative(s) to the No -build Alternative to characterize <br />effects of the proposed project on GHG emissions. The <br />analysis of climate change also will also incorporate the <br />most recent guidance found on the Caltrans Standard <br />Environmental Reference and Caltrans annotated <br />outline. <br />Air Quality ConformityAnalysis Report and Checklist. <br />Under NEPA delegation, the federal air quality <br />conformity determination has not been delegated to <br />Caltrans and must be made by FHWA. We will prepare a <br />separate Air Quality Conformity Analysis using the <br />annotated outline for this report on the SER at the time <br />that the report is initiated and will also prepare the <br />Conformity Checklist based on the checklist that is <br />available on the SER at the time that the Air Quality <br />Conformity Analysis Report is prepared. <br />SCAG Transportation Conformity Working Group. The <br />required TCWG form will be completed and submitted <br />for forwarding to SCAG for inclusion on the agenda for <br />determining if the project is a project of air quality <br />concern (POAQC). It is assumed the project will be <br />found to not be a POAQC and that no specific analysis <br />will be required related to the TCWG determination <br />other than what is already included in this scope of <br />work. <br />Mitigation Measures. ICF Jones & Stokes will develop <br />mitigation measures, where applicable, to address <br />significant air quality impacts, if present. <br />Environmental Document <br />For the proposed project itis assumed that the NEPA <br />documentto be prepared will be a Categorical Exclusion <br />with technical studies. Railroad grade separations are <br />identified as NEPA Categorical Exclusions under 23 CFR <br />771.117(d). Railroad grade separations are statutorily <br />exempt from CEQA, as identified in Section 21080.13 of <br />the Public Resources Code and in Section 15282(g) of <br />the CEQA Guidelines. Statutorily exempt projects are <br />excused entirely from the environmental review process <br />and the requirements of CEQA. In addition, all activities <br />performed to support these projects are also included in <br />the exemption. It is assumed that all project <br />components are associated with the railroad grade <br />separation and would be covered under the exemption. <br />Therefore, it is assumed that no CEQA document or <br />documentation will be required for the proposed <br />■ Proposal for Project Study Report Equivalent and Co <br />Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project <br />project. If components are added to the project that are <br />not related to the grade separation then the statutory <br />exemption may not apply and additional work not <br />covered in this scope and cost, including a CEQA <br />document, may be required. <br />Statutory Exemption (CEQA)/Categorical Exclusion <br />(NEPA) <br />A Notice of Exemption (NOE) will be prepared and <br />provided to the City for approval and submittal to the <br />State Clearinghouse. This notice starts the statue of <br />limitations under CEQA so it is recommended that the <br />City file this notice. No additional CEQA documentation <br />beyond the completion of the NOE form is assumed as <br />part of this scope and cost. <br />Based on the environmental technical studies <br />previously discussed a Categorical Exclusion (CE) will be <br />prepared pursuant to NEPA. ICF Jones & Stokes will <br />prepare the CE in compliance with the latest format <br />identified on Caltrans Standard Environmental <br />Reference website. In addition, the Categorical <br />Exclusion Checklist will be prepared. <br />As part of the CE a detailed project description will be <br />included. The CE will also include a very brief (two to <br />three sentence) summary of the findings of each of the <br />technical studies. No separate environmental <br />document is assumed to be prepared to supportthe CE <br />and none is included in this scope and cost. <br />It is assumed that ICF Jones & Stokes will revise the CE <br />twice based on comments from the City and Caltrans (to <br />be reviewed concurrently). <br />Environmental Commitments Record <br />For the project an environmental commitments record <br />(ECR) will be prepared in a matrix table format. The ECR <br />will be submitted to the City and Caltrans in hard copy <br />and electronic form. The matrix table will include a <br />description of each mitigation measure organized by <br />topic numbered to correspond with the impacts. For <br />each mitigation measure, the Reporting Process, Timing <br />of Measure, Responsible Party, and Verification of <br />Compliance will be identified through coordination with <br />resource agencies and experience on other similar <br />projects. The ECR will be included with the CE and it is <br />assumed thatthis document will be reviewed as part of <br />the City and Caltrans review of the CE. <br />Deliverables (5 Copies Each). <br />• Notice of Exemption <br />• Draftand Final Categorical Exclusion and <br />MMRP <br />Optional Scope for Environmental <br />Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact, if <br />required <br />If for some reason a NEPA CE were found to be not <br />appropriate for the proposed project then an <br />Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant <br />Impact (EA/FONSI) would be prepared. Under this <br />scenario the previously identified Section 4.0 <br />(Environmental Document) scope would be replaced <br />nceptual Engineering Plans for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.