04 - Contract - Interior Demolition Inc - 8 Properties

Home Browse Search

Contract with Interior Demolition, Inc. far the Demolition of Eight Properties May 20~ 1 Page ~ Responsive bids were received from five qualified firms All bids received are summarized in the table below Com an Name City Total did Amount Interior demolition, Inc. Montrose, CA ~1~,~35.Da Graham Crackers Demo, Inc. Menifee, CA g~,~46.00 Vizion's lllllest, Inc. 1!llinchester, CA ~98,2~4.go Flores Sierra Contractors, Inc. Chula Vista, CA 0,~~2.Do 5M Contracting Tustin, CA ~134,32o.Q0 The bid received from Interior Demolition, Inc. was the lowest responsive bid. A contingency of 20°fo or a total project budget Exhibit 3} of g4,~~~.~4 will ensure adequate funding to demolish the buildings, provide for necessary site work and fund any necessary contingencies. Prior to publishing the Request for Proposals, all structures were tested for lead and asbestos and some of the structures tested positive for these environmental hazards. Interior Demolition, Inc. has the appropriate licenses and certifications to remove and dispose of these materials. These properties have been offered to the Santa Ana Historic Preservation Satiety ~SAHPS} far the purpose of identifying items to be salvaged. Interior Demolition, Inca will be removing the items identified by SAHPS. SAHPS will be responsible for transporting the items to their storage facility EN~IR~NI~IENTAL ~P~ACT The environmental impact of demolishing these properties was evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Transit Zoning Code ~SCH # ~00~0~~ ~ a4}, which was certified by the Santa Ana City Council on June ~O~o. Specifically, these demolitians are a component of the "Station District Project" also called the "Developer Project"} analyzed therein. There have been no changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require any major revisions to the Final EIR and there is no new information with respect to the project that would require such revisions. Therefore, na supplemental or subsequent environmental analysis is required under Public Resources Code section 1 The revisions to the Station District Project resulting Pram the April 18, Z~1 ~ Settlement Agreement between the City and Agency and the Friends of the Lacy Historic Neighborhood do not change this conclusion. Additionally, in compliance with mitigation measure MM4.463, adopted by the City and the Agency an June 20~ g, the Agency has determined that none of the properties identified shave far demolition are historical resaurces as defined in Section 1 ~g~4.5 of the Guidelines far implementatian of the California Environmental Quality Act ~"CEQA"}. The "Station District Project Historical Assessment" prepared by Sapphas Environmental, Inc. ~E~chibit 4} supports this conclusion.