|
Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical associations of the
<br /> building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. Na associations
<br /> with important events, famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations or businesses, or
<br /> important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of Santa Ana were
<br /> identified at this property. Constructed circa 19U9, the building was not present when the City of
<br /> Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, asingle-family residence, is an example of
<br /> residential development in the lacy neighborhood from 1895 to 1930 when single-family
<br /> residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. No persons are Known
<br /> to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana while living at this
<br /> address. The building cannot be considered far architectural significance or association with a
<br /> notable architect, builder, or designer due to the extent and severity of the alterations,
<br /> ,5.3.7 b21 East Fifth Street
<br /> The residence at ~~1 Fast Fifth Street is a significant historical resource. ~t appears individually
<br /> eligible far inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing
<br /> characteristics of an architectural style or period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar
<br /> design features. Most likely constructed just before the turn of the twentieth century, it is an
<br /> exarnpie of a Queen Anne Fate Victorians cottage, Character~defining features include the cross-
<br /> gabled roof; bands of contrasting patterned shingles in the gable end and frieze; exterior covering
<br /> of simple, drop siding, sunburst ornament in the front gable face; central cutaway bay; and entry
<br /> parch configuration and detailing, including slender past and carved brackets. The property would
<br /> also be eligible for the SARHP under Criterion 3 because of the relative scarcity of examples of
<br /> Queen Anne cottages in Santa Ana. The recommended categorization would be "Contributive"
<br /> because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a neighborhood ar district
<br /> and is a goad example of period architecture, The property does not illustrate the class of resource
<br /> sufficiently to warrant eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP or the CRHR under Criterion C13. an
<br /> addition, the integrity of design, materials, and workmanship has been somewhat compromised;
<br /> one entry on the porch has been enclosed, and the remaining entry has a nonoriginal door.
<br /> The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria A11, 812, ar Dl4 or under SARHP
<br /> Criteria 2, 4, 5, or G. Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical
<br /> associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana.
<br /> Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers, renowned organizations or
<br /> businesses; or important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of
<br /> Santa Ana were identified at this property. With an estimated construction date in the late 189os ar
<br /> early 19~Os, the building was not present when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 1$~9. As a
<br /> single-family residence, it is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from
<br /> 1895 to 193o when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in
<br /> the area. No persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of
<br /> Santa Ana white living at this address. I he building is not associated with the work of a notable
<br /> architect, builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of
<br /> Santa Ana ar at large.
<br /> ~r3rV 712 East Fifth Street
<br /> The residence afi 712 Fast Fifth Street does not appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, ar the
<br /> SARHP under any criteria and is therefore not a historical resource. Most likely constructed in the
<br /> late 189as, this example of the Queen Anne Late Victorians has lost its integrity of design,
<br /> materials, warkrnar~s~h'~i~p, feeling, and association, Alterations include a circa 198D partial-wi~;~th
<br />
<br /> Station District Project°~, HistoricalAsses,~~~~r°~
<br /> ~1ay 2011 Sapp~ios Envirorrme~, t~~>
<br /> lN;1~RUJfCT~~ 1471 I ~ 'i ~:fr ~Doct~r~entslF~istarical Ass~ssme~t~~ina115 Resc~~ts. Doc ~ Pf , f
<br />
<br />
|