My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31B - VARIANCE - 2445 S BRISTOL ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
06/20/2011
>
31B - VARIANCE - 2445 S BRISTOL ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:43:50 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31B
Date
6/20/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance No. 2011-05 <br />May 23, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability <br />to make these findings would result in a denial. Using this information staff has prepared the <br />following analysis, which in turn forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />El Super has two existing wall-mounted signs over the main entry which are located on a building <br />wall and positioned at 45 degree angles from the building elevation, causing them to function as <br />dedicated secondary wall signs on the north and south building elevation. The unique architectural <br />feature of the building creates a unique circumstance. As previously discussed, the applicant is <br />proposing to install three additional secondary wall signs that would say "Panadeda," "Camiceria" <br />and "Tortilleria" (Exhibits 4 and 5). <br />Section 41-863 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code allows one wall sign per tenant space per <br />elevation and is intended to minimize visual clutter and blight on buildings located on commercial <br />corridors. In this case there are already two existing wall signs placed on the primary elevation, <br />although the signs are technically facing to the north and south. These signs were permitted and <br />are in compliance with the current sign code. The proposed "Panaderia," "Camiceria" and <br />"Tortilleria" signs are not permitted by code since retail wall signage is limited to one wall per <br />building elevation. The applicant contends that due to the addition of a new and unique component <br />to the existing El Super use, the additional signage is justified in order to identify this activity and <br />remain competitive in the local marketplace. In addition, the nature of the business is not clearly <br />stated in their name and the applicant wishes to maintain a corporate conformity with other grocery <br />locations within the City. <br />In analyzing the variance request staff considered the criteria listed above. The El Super building <br />itself has a primary, street-facing elevation of approximately 180 linear feet. Were this to be divided <br />into individual tenant spaces, this elevation would be permitted to have substantially more than <br />three signs depending on the number of tenants. This large building elevation can support the <br />addition of three secondary signs without creating sign clutter. The addition of the three signs is not <br />substantial enough to create a detriment, nor does the request adversely affect the General Plan. <br />Based on this rationale and on previous Planning Commission determinations of similar requests by <br />supermarket uses in the City, staff recommends that this variance request be approved. <br />Public Notification <br />The project site is located on the borders of the following Neighborhood Associations: Sunwood <br />Central, Rose Baker and Thornton Park. Each of the presidents of these Neighborhood <br />Associations was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, each <br />representative was contacted to ensure that they were notified of the project and to see if there <br />were any areas of concern. No areas of concern were identified by any of the Neighborhood <br />Association presidents, nor was there a request that the applicant present the project to a <br />meeting of their members. <br />31 B-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.