My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP INC. (JOHN RISK) 1a
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
>
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP INC. (JOHN RISK) 1a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 4:25:04 PM
Creation date
9/20/2011 9:03:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP INC. (JOHN RISK)
Contract #
A-2011-195
Agency
PARKS, RECREATION, & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Council Approval Date
8/1/2011
Expiration Date
3/31/2012
Insurance Exp Date
3/9/2013
Destruction Year
2018
Notes
Amends N-2011-012 Amended by A-2012-151
Document Relationships
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP INC. (JOHN RISK) 1b
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT GROUP, INC. (JOHN RISK) 1
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposal Letter <br />City of Santa Ana <br />1 -Yr. AT&T and 3-Yr.Time Warner Review <br />Communications Support Group, Inc. <br />• CPUC Section 5860(d) allows the company to use an accrual basis for <br />calculating franchise fees on video service revenues. Accordingly, it was <br />necessary to factor out the portion of bad debt associated with the non -video and <br />non -assessable lines of business (on-line services and telephone). We <br />performed a high-level analysis of Time Warner's bad debts for 2008 and 2009. <br />We found that Time Warner prorated bad debt between two lines of business, <br />video and HSD. The billing system tracks total net bad debt to the video line of <br />business. We recommend that these differences be quantified for all three years <br />in the next phase of auditing and franchise fees be recalculated on the more <br />accurate bad debt amounts. <br />• Mr. Bill Morgan, of Diehl Evans & Company, LLP has begun collecting financial <br />documents for calendar years 2008 through 2010 associated with Time Warner's <br />advertising media division. We are of the opinion that although company officials <br />have not yet provided any written representations that all national, regional and <br />local ad revenues have been accurately and completely reported to the City by <br />using our questionnaire, we have certain knowledge to make some general <br />conclusions. However, since advertising is prorated based on subscriber counts, <br />should it be determined that Time Warner is using a lower count of Santa Ana <br />subscribers due to the issue of multiple agents, than advertising revenues may <br />have been under -attributed to franchise fees owed to City. We recommend that <br />this matter be further studied and franchise fee calculations be adjusted to <br />account for any under reported revenues found in the analysis. <br />• Mr. Bill Morgan, of Diehl Evans & Company, LLP will also begin collecting <br />financial documents for calendar years 2008 through 2010 associated with Time <br />Warner's home shopping and other non -subscriber revenues (local origination, <br />sale of leased access time, etc.) and determine whether these revenues were <br />properly allocated to Santa Ana. <br />• After the end of the 4th quarter 2010, Time Warner notified the City that the <br />company would reduce the City's 4th quarter 2010 franchise fee payment by <br />$2,720.90, due to the company's argument that the state CPUC administration <br />fee would qualify as a franchise fee under federal law. We recommend that the <br />City continue to assert that the Company improperly deducted $2,720.90 and <br />require Time Warner to repay this amount plus a reasonable accrual of interest. <br />©2011 Communications Support Group, Inc. Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.