My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - AGREEMENT CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
01/17/2012
>
25B - AGREEMENT CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 10:25:28 AM
Creation date
1/12/2012 2:59:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25B
Date
1/17/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Agreement for CALGreen and LEED Training <br /> January 17, 2012 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> There are two certificates under the LEED designation: the Green Associate (GA) and the <br /> Accredited Professional (AP). The LEED GA credential is intended for professionals who want to <br /> demonstrate green building expertise in nontechnical fields of practice. LEED GA denotes basic <br /> knowledge of green design, construction, and operation. The LEED AP credential signifies an <br /> advanced depth of knowledge in green building practices including on-site experience. The <br /> proposed training will include both certificates. <br /> <br /> To perform the training, professional services are required. To find a qualified training company, a <br /> Request for Proposals was issued on November 1, 2011. Below is a summary of the proposals <br /> solicited, and those received: <br /> <br /> 5 Requests for Proposals mailed <br /> 0 Requests for Proposals mailed to Santa Ana vendors <br /> 5 proposals received <br /> 0 proposals received from Santa Ana vendors <br /> <br /> The consultants were evaluated according to their experience, past performance, responsiveness, <br /> and cost. The proposals by the five companies were reviewed by a team from the Public Works <br /> Agency, Planning and Building Agency, and the City's Energy and Sustainability Contractor. The <br /> ratings for the five proposals were as follows: <br /> <br /> NAME OF RESPONSIVE BIDDER RATING <br /> GreenSte Education 91 <br /> Triple Green Education 87 <br /> Everblue 75 <br /> Professor H un'oo Kim 72 <br /> Krout and Associates 71 <br /> <br /> The two best qualified companies were interviewed by the team. GreenStep Education is the lower <br /> cost proposer and received the highest average score of 91. <br /> <br /> BIDDER COST <br /> GreenSte Education $50,180 <br /> Triple Green Education $91,982 <br /> i <br /> The staff recommends that GreenStep Education be retained for these services. GreenStep <br /> Education has conducted more than 250 classes, and over 90 percent of its students have passed <br /> the LEED AP test. Staff is also recommending the addition of a $5,000 contingency. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 25B-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.