My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25H - AGMT - MASTER LANDSCAPE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
01/17/2012
>
25H - AGMT - MASTER LANDSCAPE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 10:27:42 AM
Creation date
1/12/2012 4:22:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
25H
Date
1/17/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> III. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS <br /> <br /> The response to this Request for Proposals should contain documentation of contractor's credentials <br /> and expertise in this field. Consideration will be given to contractors with demonstrable and <br /> documented experience in similar work. An evaluation committee will review the responses received <br /> and interview the companies who submit the most responsive proposals. The following evaluation <br /> criteria and weights will be used to evaluate the bids: <br /> <br /> Capability and Experience of Contractor (25%) <br /> 1. Ability of contractor and his/her ball diamond infield maintenance sub-contractor to obtain the <br /> staff and equipment necessary to perform specifications as outlined in the contractor's business <br /> plan <br /> 2. Ongoing plan for providing certified irrigation techs on this job, and FTE's assigned <br /> 3. Training and safety precautions taken to perform specifications <br /> 4. Experience of supervisory and management staff assigned to the contract <br /> 5. The value of any new product or service suggestions or other new ideas or enhancements <br /> <br /> Past Performances (25%) <br /> 1. Past record of performance on contracts of similar size and scope with Santa Ana or other <br /> governmental agencies including such factors as reliability, adherence to specifications and <br /> compliance with contract terms and conditions <br /> 2. Past record of performance on requests for extra work, including ability to accurately bid jobs, <br /> cost competitiveness, and quality of work <br /> 3. Acceptable, verifiable references and site reviews <br /> <br /> Cost of Proposal 50%) <br /> 1. Cost of base proposal <br /> 2. Cost of specialized services <br /> <br /> Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those proposals <br /> receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the right to award the <br /> contract to any proposer with a score above 70. <br /> <br /> FOLLOW-UP OF EVALUATION PROCESS BY CONTRACTOR <br /> Contractors may follow up on the evaluation of the proposals by contacting Robert Carroll, via email <br /> at rcarroll@santa-ana.org. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> 25H-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.