Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Recommendation #3 - Have the driver sign a liability waiver in order to eliminate the <br /> requirement for officers to consider towing a vehicle due to the high crime area. Given <br /> the explanation and advice of the Police Legal Advisor, this recommendation will not be <br /> included. This practice could potentially open the officer, the Department and the City to <br /> claims alleging liability where there is none. <br /> Recommendation #4 - Allow for a 24-hour storage for a vehicle that has never been <br /> impounded and a 30-day impoundment for a vehicle that has been impounded two times <br /> or more in the last six months. The policy will permit the vehicle to be released the next <br /> business day (less than 24-hours) unless a 30-day hold is permissible as established by <br /> the policy. A 30-day impound may be authorized when a vehicle is impounded where <br /> the driver has been issued a citation for a licensing violation at least once in the past <br /> nine months or two or more times in the past three years, or other violations as <br /> enumerated in the policy. <br /> Recommendation #5 - Eliminate the language regarding the "Due proves clause under <br /> the 5th amendment of the U.S. Constitution and case law:" reference to Post Storage <br /> Hearings. Deputy Chief Rojas stated the language related to the due process of law <br /> was changed from the 5th amendment of the U.S. constitution (Federal Standard) to the <br /> 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which more accurately reflects local <br /> government's duty to extend due process. Language referencing the post-storage <br /> hearing requirements as set forth in the Vehicle Code was also included in the policy. <br /> <br /> Recommendation #6 - No officer shall leave stranded any person who would not be able <br /> to obtain transportation in a safe manner. The policy and current law already addresses <br /> this issue. <br /> Recommendation #7 - Accept an alternate form of identification in lieu of a fingerprint. <br /> The Santa Ana Police Department must require a reasonable form of identification that <br /> can be used to identify a person and prosecute that person for any criminal offenses as <br /> appropriate. Unless necessary in furtherance of prosecution, no fingerprint obtained as <br /> required by law shall be entered into any database. <br /> <br /> <br /> 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> • Emilo Ramos stated until now, they have only received fragments of the new <br /> policy with the condition that it could be modified without notice. Negotiations <br /> have gone on with intrigue and secrets. He would also like more meetings with <br /> the Police Department. <br /> • Abraham Medina feels there is urgency for the policy due to families involved. <br /> • Gema Salas feels towing and fees are still unfair. Many jobs need vehicles. <br /> • Maria Zacarias doesn't like the idea of no liability and doesn't want towing at all. <br /> • Paty Madueno believes the policy still needs to be worked on and feels it is the <br /> same as the previous policy. <br /> • Jose Tinajero appreciates the time that has been put in the new policy. <br /> • Albert Castillo doesn't feel it was right that the Community did not have the <br /> opportunity to review the policy prior to the meeting. Vehicles are still being <br /> towed. He agrees with Recommendation #1. He does not understand <br /> Recommendation #2. He questions the locations are considered "high crime <br /> areas". He feels 30 days hold on a vehicle is cruel and unusual punishment. <br /> <br /> 13B-2 <br />