My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-27 PUBLIC SAFETY
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES
>
PUBLIC SAFETY (2003-2016)
>
2011
>
2011-09-27 PUBLIC SAFETY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 11:51:01 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 11:50:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/27/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendation #3 -Have the driver sign a liability waiver in order to eliminate the <br />requirement for officers to consider towing a vehicle due to the high crime area. Given <br />the explanation and advice of the Police Legal Advisor, this recommendation will not be <br />included. This practice could potentially open the officer, the Department and the City to <br />claims alleging liability where there is none. <br />Recommendation #4 - Allow for a 24-hour storage for a vehicle that has never been <br />impounded and a 30-day impoundment for a vehicle that has been impounded two times <br />or more in the last six months. The policy will permit the vehicle to be released the next <br />business day (less than 24-hours) unless a 30-day hold is permissible as established by <br />the policy. A 30-day impound may be authorized when a vehicle is impounded where <br />the driver has been issued a citation for a licensing violation at least once in the past <br />nine months or two or more times in the past three years, or other violations as <br />enumerated in the policy. <br />Recommendation #5 - Eliminate the language regarding the "Due proves clause under <br />the 5`h amendment of the U.S. Constitution and case law:" reference to Post Storage <br />Hearings. Deputy Chief Rojas stated the language related to the due process of law <br />was changed from the 5`h amendment of the U.S. constitution (Federal Standard) to the <br />14th amendment of the U.S_ Constitution, which more accurately reflects local <br />government's duty to extend due process. Language referencing the post-storage <br />hearing requirements as set forth in the Vehicle Code was also included in the policy. <br />Recommendation #6 - No officer shall leave stranded any person who would not be able <br />to obtain transportation in a safe manner. The policy and current law already addresses <br />this issue. <br />Recommendation #7 - Accept an alternate form of identification in lieu of a fingerprint. <br />The Santa Ana Police Department must require a reasonable form of identification that <br />can be used to identify a person and prosecute that person for any criminal offenses as <br />appropriate. Unless necessary in furtherance of prosecution, no fingerprint obtained as <br />required by law shall be entered into any database. <br />3. PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />• Emilo Ramos stated until now, they have only received fragments of the new <br />policy with the condition that it could be modified without notice. Negotiations <br />have gone on with intrigue and secrets. He would also like more meetings with <br />the Police Department. <br />• Abraham Medina feels there is urgency for the policy due to families involved. <br />• Gema Salas feels towing and fees are still unfair. Many jobs need vehicles. <br />• Maria Zacarias doesn't like the idea of no liability and doesn't want towing at all. <br />• Paty Madueno believes the policy still needs to be worked on and feels it is the <br />same as the previous policy. <br />• Jose Tinajero appreciates the time that has been put in the new policy. <br />• Albert Castillo doesn't feel it was right that the Community did not have the <br />opportunity to review the policy prior to the meeting. Vehicles are still being <br />towed. He agrees with Recommendation #1. He does not understand <br />Recommendation #2. He questions the locations are considered "high crime <br />areas". He feels 30 days hold on a vehicle is cruel and unusual punishment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.