Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Pro/ect AitematAm Attachment "A" <br />related impact at the intersection of South Bristol Street and West Segerstrom Avenue, which would <br />occur between the hours of 7:15 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and between the hours of 2:30 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. <br />(Monday through Friday). Alternative Site No. 1 also would create a new, significant long-term <br />impact to public services by adversely affecting the provision of police protection services. This <br />alternative also would result in a significant impact to emergency access under long-term conditions, <br />which could only be mitigated with the acquisition of private property, thus, negating the purpose of <br />analyzing this alternative, i.e., to examine whether it would be possible to design the project to avoid <br />the need to condemn private property. Impacts related to air quality/greenhouse gas emissions, noise, <br />utilities and service systems, and water quality and hydrology would be similar to the proposed <br />Project's impacts during construction and long-term operation. Additionally, both the City's Police <br />Department and Fire Department object to this alternative for the reasons explained above. <br />3.4.3.3 Finding and Rationale for Alternative Site No. 1 <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make Alternative Site No. 1 infeasible. <br />Alternative Site No. 1 would not avoid or substantially lessen the Project's near-term significant and <br />unavoidable construction-related impact at the intersection of South Bristol Street and West <br />Segerstrom Avenue, which would occur between the hours of 7:15 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and between <br />the hours of 2:30 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. (Monday through Friday). This alternative also would introduce <br />new impacts to public services (long-term) and emergency access (long-term) that would not occur in <br />association with the proposed Project. None of the other impacts associated with the proposed <br />Project would be avoided or substantially lessened with implementation of this alternative. <br />Additionally, the Santa Ana Police Department reviewed the proposal to construct a lift station at <br />Alternative Site No. 1, and determined that this alternative has the potential to adversely affect public <br />safety. In a letter dated March 15, 20101, the Police Department indicated that locating a lift station <br />at Alternative Site No. 1 would obstruct the line of sight for patrol and passerby, thereby inhibiting <br />the ability of police (and the public) to monitor activities within the alley located north of this <br />alternative site location. In addition, the Police Department noted that a lift station at Alternative Site <br />No. 1 would leave a significant amount of dead space behind the building which could "provide <br />concealment for transients and other undesirable activities" and "create an attractive nuisance" for <br />graffiti (see RDEIR Appendix H for the complete letter from the Santa Ana Police Department). The <br />only available mitigation for this impact would be to re-locate the proposed lift station to the west, <br />which would be the same design as proposed by the Project. <br />Further, the City Fire Department reviewed the proposal to construct a lift station at Alternative Site <br />No. 1 and determined this alternative would interfere with the ability of emergency vehicles to <br />navigate the turn between the west end of San Lorenzo Avenue and the north-south oriented alley. <br />(See letter from Fire Chief Dave Thomas to Raul Godinez, dated March 17, 2011, RDEIR Appendix <br />H.) Specifically, the Fire Department determined at Alternative Site No. 1 would not meet the Fire <br />Department's minimum turn radius requirement (minimum 20-foot interior and 40-foot exterior turn <br />radius), as required by Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Sec. 14-25. In addition, the City has an <br />Automatic Mutual Aide agreement provided by the Costa Mesa Fire Department (CMFD), and such <br />aid may be provided by larger CMFD vehicles that require a minimum 28-foot interior and 46-foot <br />' The letter from the Santa Ana Police Department included in Appendix H of the RDEIR is erroneously dated <br />March 15, 2010; this letter was actually provided to the Public Works Department in March 2011. <br />San Lorenzo Lift Station FIR (Project No. 06-3510) 3-7 <br />CEQA Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations