Laserfiche WebLink
ZOA No. 2012 -01, DA No. 2004 -03, <br />VTTM No. 2012 -01, and SPR No. 2012 -01 <br />February 13, 2012 <br />Page 9 <br />The Planning Commission previously requested that the open space amenities, such as the pool, be of <br />adequate size to be usable. In order to provide a guideline for assessing the adequacy of the open <br />space amenities, Table 8 provides a comparison of the amenities provided in the Lyon project, a <br />recently approved and relatively comparable project, with those proposed for The Met. <br />Table 8 — Amenities Comparison <br />Amenity Feature ; <br />The Pinnacle <br />Lyon - <br />The_Met <br />273 units' <br />':' <br />'3Q units <br />2.8 units <br />Pool <br />2,100 s . ft. <br />1,344 s . ft. <br />756 s . ft. <br />Club Room /Fitness Facility <br />6,830 s . ft. <br />6,750 s . ft. <br />3,050 s . ft. <br />Courtyards <br />18,900 s . ft. <br />19,140 s . ft. <br />22,100 s . ft. <br />Roof Deck <br />n/a <br />37,900 s . ft. in one deck <br />12,550 s . ft. in two decks <br />At its January 23, 2012 Planning Commission hearing there was discussion in regards to the overall <br />open space proposed, amenities and location of the space. The applicant has submitted a revised <br />open space plan (Exhibit 10). At the time of packet distribution, staff was continuing to evaluate the <br />recent submittal. <br />Amendment to the Development Agreement <br />In 2005, the City approved several entitlements, including a development agreement, with Mola <br />Development for the Geneva Commons development. The development agreement established <br />development intensity, permitted uses and development standards for the term of the agreement. <br />Further, the approved development agreement required certain improvements and public benefits <br />such as in -lieu fees for parkland dedication, payment of an inclusionary housing fee, and the <br />execution of an off -site improvement agreement with the Sandpointe Neighborhood Association. <br />The Geneva Commons project did not proceed and the property was acquired by Vineyard <br />Development, who has proposed a mid -rise residential development. The amendments to <br />Development Agreement No. 2004 -03 recognize Vineyard as the primary developer and owner of the <br />project and the primary deal points are essentially the same as those contained in the previous <br />Development Agreement. The amendments reflect the new scope of the project, such as an increase <br />in the number of units, as well as a new development design. All other elements of the development <br />agreement will remain (Exhibit 7). <br />The development agreement is a legal contract between the developer and the City that defines the <br />terms and nature of development proposed for the project site. This agreement establishes <br />development intensity, permitted uses and standards for the term of the agreement. In exchange for <br />the City vesting the proposed project, the development agreement requires certain improvements and <br />public benefits (Exhibit 7). The primary deal points of the agreement include: <br />75A -15 <br />