My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
23A - EDNA PARK
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
03/05/2012
>
23A - EDNA PARK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 6:01:46 PM
Creation date
3/1/2012 5:41:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
23A
Date
3/5/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Contract Award for <br />Edna Park Improvements <br />March 5, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />NAME OF RESPONSIVE BIDDER CITY BASE BID AMOUNT <br />1. Green Giant Landscape, Inc. La Habra $219,000.00 <br />2. Micon Construction, Inc. Placentia $224,672.08 <br />3. Lehman Construction, Inc. Tustin $229,785.00 <br />4. Patscheck Construction, Inc. Costa Mesa $229,820.00 <br />5. Kasa Construction, Inc. Ontario $235,999.00 <br />6. Ted Enterprises, Inc. San Clemente $240,700.00 <br />7. Fleming Environmental Fullerton $243,685.00 <br />8. American Building Solutions, Inc. San Fernando $249,500.00 <br />9. Alpha 1 Construction, Inc. Santa Fe Springs $254,824.00 <br />10. Rezman, Inc. Brea $257,981.00 <br />11. Ace CD, Inc. Glendora $258,700.00 <br />12. Hondo Company, Inc. Santa Ana $258,960.00 <br />13. O'Connell Engineering Construction, Inc. Winchester $279,000.00 <br />14. STL Landscape, Inc. Los Angeles $288,000.00 <br />15. Unique Performance Construction Costa Mesa $332,000.00 <br />16. C.S. Legacy, Inc. Chino $333,277.00 <br />The Engineer's estimate for this project was $242,000. A total of 16 bids were received and all <br />were deemed responsive. The bid documents require the contractor to be selected based on the <br />lowest base bid. The lowest base bid was submitted by Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for <br />$219,000. <br />A bid protest was submitted by the third-lowest bidder, Lehman Construction Inc., stating that the <br />first and second low bidders failed to list a flooring subcontractor (Exhibit 2). A bid protest hearing <br />was held on February 2, 2012; the protest was overruled with the conclusion that the failure to list <br />the subcontractor did not provide an advantage to the low bidder nor did it disadvantage any of the <br />other bidders and did not affect the outcome of the bid. Green Giant is the lowest responsible <br />bidder (Exhibit 3). Therefore, staff recommends awarding base bid plus alternates one and two to <br />Green Giant Landscape, Inc. in the amount of $264,000. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />Environmental Review #ER-2006-170 <br />Negative Declaration have been filed <br />Certificate of Categorical Exclusion <br />Protection Act. <br />has been completed, and <br />pursuant to the California <br />has been filed pursuant <br />23A-2 <br />a Notice of Determination and <br />Environmental Quality Act. A <br />to the National Environmental
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.