Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ZOA No. 2012-01, DA No. 2004-03, <br /> VTTM No. 2012-01, and SPR No. 2012-01 <br /> February 13, 2012 <br /> Page 9 <br /> <br /> The Planning Commission previously requested that the open space amenities, such as the pool, be of <br /> adequate size to be usable. In order to provide a guideline for assessing the adequacy of the open <br /> space amenities, Table 8 provides a comparison of the amenities provided in the Lyon project, a <br /> recently approved and relatively comparable project, with those proposed for The Met. <br /> <br /> Table 8 - Amenities Comparison <br /> <br /> Amenity Feature The Pinnacle T Lyon The Met <br /> 273 units 304 units 284 units <br /> Pool 2,100 s q. ft. 1,344 s q. ft. 756 s q. ft. <br /> Club Room/Fitness Facility 6,830 sq. ft. 6,750 s q. ft. 3,050 s q. ft. <br /> Courtyards 18,900 s q. ft. 19,140 s q. ft. 22,100 s q. ft. <br /> Roof Deck n/a 37,900 sq. ft. in one deck 12,550 s q. ft. in two decks <br /> <br /> At its January 23, 2012 Planning Commission hearing there was discussion in regards to the overall <br /> open space proposed, amenities and location of the space. The applicant has submitted a revised <br /> open space plan (Exhibit 10). At the time of packet distribution, staff was continuing to evaluate the <br /> recent submittal. <br /> Amendment to the Development Agreement <br /> <br /> In 2005, the City approved several entitlements, including a development agreement, with Mola <br /> Development for the Geneva Commons development. The development agreement established <br /> development intensity, permitted uses and development standards for the term of the agreement. <br /> Further, the approved development agreement required certain improvements and public benefits <br /> such as in-lieu fees for parkland dedication, payment of an inclusionary housing fee, and the <br /> execution of an off-site improvement agreement with the Sandpointe Neighborhood Association. <br /> <br /> The Geneva Commons project did not proceed and the property was acquired by Vineyard <br /> Development, who has proposed a mid-rise residential development. The amendments to <br /> Development Agreement No. 2004-03 recognize Vineyard as the primary developer and owner of the <br /> project and the primary deal points are essentially the same as those contained in the previous <br /> Development Agreement. The amendments reflect the new scope of the project, such as an increase <br /> in the number of units, as well as a new development design. All other elements of the development <br /> agreement will remain (Exhibit 7). <br /> The development agreement is a legal contract between the developer and the City that defines the <br /> terms and nature of development proposed for the project site. This agreement establishes <br /> development intensity, permitted uses and standards for the term of the agreement. In exchange for <br /> the City vesting the proposed project, the development agreement requires certain improvements and <br /> public benefits (Exhibit 7). The primary deal points of the agreement include: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 75A-15 <br />