Laserfiche WebLink
C. <br />WORK STUDY SESSION <br />Senior Planner Lucy Linnaus provided an overview of the new Orangewood Charter <br />Academy project and introduced the Orangewood Children's Foundation staff. <br />Chris Simonsen, Chief Financial Officer with the Orangewood Children's Foundation, <br />provided an overview of the publicly funded chartered school that will provide <br />educational facilities serving a projected maximum of 450 students with on-site <br />housing for 80 children in family -style clustered dormitories. The school's charter <br />was approved by the Orange County Board of Education. <br />Wendy Rogers, Principal architect, provided a detailed presentation on the site plan, <br />architecture, materials, landscaping, on-site circulation and overall tone and feel of <br />the project. She stated that they would be pursuing LEED Silver certification for the <br />project. She explained how the site layout had been designed to address any <br />concerns from the adjacent neighborhood regarding noise, light spillage and parking. <br />She further explained that Orangewood is pursuing a parking agreement with the <br />church immediately across the street for use during special events, but that there <br />would be adequate on-site parking for the daily operations of the school. <br />The Commissioners provided the following comments. <br />Commissioner Yrarrazaval inquired as to who provides funding and how students <br />would be selected. Applicant's staff responded that funding was being provided <br />through donations and grants administered through the Orangewood Children's <br />Foundation. As a public charter school, it would be open to the public with priority <br />given to students in foster care. <br />Vice Chairman Gartner expressed support for the project design. <br />Chairman Alderete inquired about the student to adult ratio in the on-site housing. <br />Applicant responded there would be eight "house couples" within the residential <br />facilities, and one adult per ten students for on-site supervision. <br />Commissioner Yrarrazaval asked for clarification that this is not a "lock down" facility. <br />Applicant confirmed. <br />Commissioner Yrarrazaval and Nalle expressed an interest in seeing the project <br />achieve LEED Gold status. Ms. Rogers explained that achieving Gold status would <br />probably best be done through the use of photo -voltaic panels installed on the <br />building rooftops, and that, while the budget didn't allow for this at present, it could <br />be something they would pursue in the future. <br />Chairman Alderete expressed an interest in incorporating California natives into the <br />landscape palette and stated that warm color palette for the buildings was a good <br />solution to the sometimes institutional look of such facilities. <br />Chairman Alderete inquired as to the placement of residential buildings. Ms. Rogers <br />' stated that the site was divided into educational and residential "zones", with the <br />academic buildings on the north and living area to the south. <br />Chairman Yrarrazaval commented on the need for shading from the sun in the <br />outdoor eating areas. Ms. Rogers clarified the plans included a shaded area along <br />the cafeteria/multi-purpose building. <br />Senior Planner Lucy Linnaus reviewed the timeline for the project: completing the <br />Development Review process, the Mitigated Negative Declaration at end of April, <br />public outreach process underway, discretionary actions will be held during June, <br />deadline for opening the facility is Fall 2013. Edna Neighborhood meetings have <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 April 9, 2012 <br />