My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
05/07/2012
>
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:41:54 PM
Creation date
5/3/2012 3:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
5/7/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t ?-t <br />We have been processing a plats to subdivide and develop residential housing on the property for <br />over lour years. During that process, many consultants and interested citizens have offered <br />opinions on environmental, cultural and economic matters related to our proposed development <br />plan. Your committee, the City Planning Commission and, ultimately, the City Council will be <br />required to consider that input and make specific findings regarding our proposal. <br />Should you decide to ignore Mrs. Sexlinger's wishes and reconmiend the listing of the property <br />as a historical resource property, we ask you to consider the certain result of such action. If the <br />property were to be listed, it would need to remain as a residential home and home-owner <br />operated orchard (commercial operation of the orchard is not allowed under the current zoning). <br />Because it is not economically feasible to operate the orchard, and because the current home is in <br />a dilapidated condition, it is very unlikely that we will receive any economically feasible offers <br />to purchase the property. We would have very few options left, and it is likely that the property <br />would remain in its abandoned state for some time. <br />We have been informed that three consultants have reviewed the property to offer their <br />recommendation as to whether the criteria for listing can even be achieved. We understand that <br />two consultants believe that one criterion for listing might be inel. However, one of the <br />consultants has specifically opined that the property does not meet any of the criteria, and that <br />the property does not qualify for listing. <br />As we are sure you are well aware, there are laws that protect religious institutions like ours <br />when goveriunent regulations take away it property's economic vahie. 'ilrere is evidence in the <br />record before you that supports a decision not to list this property. Moreover, because the former <br />owner of the property had no desire to force the perpetual use of (he property as an orchard, and <br />because the current owners have no inclination or desire to continue that use on (lie properly, we <br />ask that you recommend that the property not be listed. <br />Sincerely, <br />t) <br />Gregg Pinick <br />Executive Director <br />Lutheran High School of Orange County <br /> <br />Kevin Tilden <br />Executive Vice President of Finance <br />and Chief Financial Officer <br />Concordia University Irvine <br />7515`49
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.