My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
05/07/2012
>
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:41:54 PM
Creation date
5/3/2012 3:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
5/7/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"The Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard is substantially intact as a rural/agricultural <br />landscape with a Craftsman Bungalow and Valencia orchard in proximity. The site as <br />a whole portray's a significant period in Santa Ana's history, and Is associated with a <br />business and use that was once common, but Is now rare. The site is eligible for the <br />Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as Key under under criterion 6." <br />It should not be overlooked that whereas all previous listings on the city's Register of <br />Historical Properties (excluding local historic districts) are for single buildings or <br />structures, the 2012-01 recommendation acknowledges the importance of contextual <br />and associational factors in ascribing "significance" to historical properties by <br />nominating both the "Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard, " and, thereby, would establish <br />a precedent for more inclusive consideration of historic status in the future. <br />Although the Save Our Orchard Coalition was pleased the city chose to recommend <br />adoption of resolution HRCA No. 2012-01 /HRC No. 2012-01, we were nonetheless <br />dismayed with the tone of the oral argument made by the city before the Historic <br />Resources Commission. The presentation itself came across as apologetic and <br />dismissive. It Identified and emphasized weaknesses of historic status determination <br />made In earlier drafts of the TAVA-EIR which had subsequently been challenged and/or <br />revised in later versions of the document. Specifically, reference was made to poor <br />condition of the orchard and insignificance of small-family orchard operations to the <br />overall regional citrus industry. Both characterizations have been demonstrated to be <br />factually incorrect, either through expert testimony or re-Interpretation of the EIR <br />consultant's own data. As a result, we feel the case for adopting the resolution for listing <br />the Sexiinger Orange Orchard on the city's Register of Historical Properties was <br />weakened from the outset. <br />Our appeal of the HRC denial of the resolution begins with the tenor and attitude <br />reflected above. The following factors -- each, and in combination -- we believe may <br />have, inappropriately (and in error), contributed to the decision to deny "historical <br />properties" status. <br />1. Condition of Orange Trees: <br />The characterization of the orange trees as "dead and dying" has persisted since 2008 <br />when the Discovery Works, Inc. "Cultural Resource Study" was drafted in response to <br />the Empire Homes, Inc. proposed housing project. SOOC has consistently challenged <br />this inaccurate and misleading assessment with current photographs of the orchard, <br />invitations for public viewing of the orchard, and through on-site appraisal by regionally- <br />recognized citrus experts. Bob Knight, owner-operator of Old Grove Orange in Mentone, <br />California and Founder and Coordinator of the Inland Orange Conservancy, a fourth <br />generation southern California citrus grower, has observed the Sexlinger Orange <br />Orchard to be in overall "good condition" despite years of neglect (i.e., lack of irrigation, <br />pruning, etc.). Mr. Knight further suggests the orchard is "commercial grade" -- capable <br />of being profitably operated. (Testimony contrary to this evidence was given before the <br />HRC by Lowell and Dwight Schroeder, two brothers who live close to the Sexlinger <br />property and, also, were small-scale commercial citrus growers.) <br />Preserving Ilistory & Heritage Promoting Education & Health Promoting Food & lobs <br />75B-23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.