My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
05/07/2012
>
75B - PH - APPEAL 1584 EAST SANTA CLARA AVE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:41:54 PM
Creation date
5/3/2012 3:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
5/7/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Secure ongoing financial support to rehabilitate and maintain the existing orchard & <br />farmhouse and develop additional facilities as part of the Sexlinger Center for Urban <br />Agriculture." <br />The first goal represents the initial reaction of some residents in the area who want to stop <br />further development of the type they have enjoyed. This opposition then morphed into the <br />SOOC. The second goal is admirable and could be supported, but only if the funds are from <br />private persons and not public funds. The third goal is also similar to the second in context. <br />It is further instructive to examine the plot plan of the redevelopment of the 5 acres proposed <br />by SOOC. This is attached as Exhibit 1 for reference. This proposes the removal of all of the <br />existing trees and replacement with about 130 trees in about 5 separated locations. The <br />existing home would be moved to a new location and two new structures provided. There <br />would also be 16 parking spaces. It also should be noted that should SOOC acquire ownership <br />of this property, a prior designation of the site as historic might impede the major changes <br />contemplated, whereas, the lack of the designation would not impede any probable use by <br />SOOC. Who would control the use of the community gardens to insure that discrimination does <br />not occur? <br />It is offensive and definitely misleading for SOOC to use the term "Our Orchard". SOOC has no <br />ownership interest in this property. Goals 1 and 2 of SOOC illustrate this improper usage. Goal 1 <br />says "our historic orchard" while Goal 2 refers to "the current owners- Concordia University <br />". Reference to "additional facilities as part of the Sexlinger Center for Urban Agriculture" <br />gives a false impression that such an organization is now in existence. <br />You should not make any decision regarding this property without giving consideration to the <br />wishes of the Sexlinger family for the disposition of the property. The family was dedicated to <br />and loved their church. It was customary for that generation to make significant bequests to <br />their church. Martha and her family knew full well that this meant conversion of their property <br />into something other than production of oranges. <br />Dwight and Lowell Schroeder. <br />Attachment: Exhibit 1. Proposed plot plan. <br />75B-30
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.