My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ANAHEIM, CITY OF (6) -2012
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
A
>
ANAHEIM, CITY OF (6) -2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2013 11:33:14 AM
Creation date
5/14/2012 2:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
ANAHEIM, CITY OF
Contract #
N-2012-048
Agency
POLICE
Destruction Year
0
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N-2012-048 <br />p.SAP??1? <br />L?r ? 8 raw `n <br />MAY 1 ? 2012 <br />,.?¢- w osm . v.a . <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana <br />Memorandum of Understanding <br />Urban Areas Security Initiative 207 7 <br />Since 2004, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through the State <br />of California's Office of Homeland Security (OHS) " as the State Administrative <br />Agency (SAA), has designated the Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana (hereafter <br />referred to as "the Cities") as Urban Areas and awarded each jurisdiction grants <br />under the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). UASI Grants have been awarded <br />yearly since 2004 with each cycle having a performance period of approximately two <br />years- In the 2004 and 2005 grant cycles, DHS awarded the funds and <br />subsequently required a Homeland Security Strategy from each of the Urban Areas. <br />Anaheim and Santa Ana submitted a joint Strategy which ultimately formed the basis <br />for Orange County's overall terrorism preparedness efforts. In addition, DHS <br />required an Initial Strategy Implementation Plan (ISIP) as an overview of how the <br />Cities planned to spend UASI grant funds- The Strategy and the ISIP were <br />approved for both grant cycles and project development and implementation is on- <br />going. <br />2. Starting with the 2006 grant cycle and with subsequent grant cycles, and at the <br />direction of Congress, DHS has redefined the criteria by which Homeland Security <br />funds are awarded under the UASI. In addition to population and population density, <br />DHS mandates that funds be distributed based upon risk and need. Additionally, as <br />part of the funding process, the latter grant cycles require a competitive application <br />process and the development of Investment Justifications to define how the Urban <br />Areas intend to spend requested funds. These changes make it clear that simply <br />because cities are eligible as a high-risk destination doesn't end the analysis, it <br />begins the analysis. The analysis then has to consider what needs the cities are <br />going to address with the particular investments proposed. Only when the <br />investment is justified will the money flow to the cities that are otherwise eligible. <br />This process ensures that not only is DHS allocating funding based on risk and <br />need, but that the funding is being used to build the regional critical capabilities <br />consistent with the DHS goals and the priorities- <br />3. The Cities elected to define each Urban Area broadly to include all jurisdictions in <br />the county, as well as key disciplines, such as Health, Law, Fire, Emergency <br />Management and others as defined by DHS_ Thus far, the grants have been <br />individually awarded to, and managed in all respects by, each City (Anaheim and <br />Santa Ana). The Cities have collaborated with the County of Orange and all other <br />California Office of Homeland Security is now known as California Emergency <br />Management Agency (CaIEMA)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.