Laserfiche WebLink
Exceptions for children old enough to <br />give consent Certain adults can be <br />prosecuted for having consensual <br />intercourse with a child who has <br />reached the age of consent. For <br />example, in one State it is a third <br />degree felony for a psychotherapist to <br />have intercourse with a 17- year -old <br />client even though 17 is over the <br />minimum age of consent in that State. <br />In another State, where an adult gener- <br />ally cannot be prosecuted for having <br />consensual intercourse with a 16 -year- <br />old, an exception is made when the <br />adult is the child's school teacher. In <br />that case the teacher can be prose- <br />cuted for a "class A" misdemeanor. <br />Exceptions are made for other profes- <br />sions as well (clergy, for example). <br />In this report, 443 of the 9,691 released <br />sex offenders are identified as statutory <br />rapists based on information supplied <br />by the prisons that released them. <br />There were more than 443 statutory <br />rapists among the 9,691 released male <br />sex offenders, but the 443 are all that <br />could be positively identified with the <br />limited information available. One <br />reason statutory rapists are not easily <br />identified from penal code information <br />available on the released sex offenders <br />is that most States do not use the term <br />"statutory rape" in their laws. <br />First release Though all 9,691 sex <br />offenders in the study were released in <br />1994, for a fourth of the offenders 1994 <br />was not the first year of release since <br />receiving their prison sentence. This <br />group had previously served a portion <br />of the sentence and were released, <br />then violated parole and were returned <br />to prison to continue serving time still <br />left on that sentence. For the remaining <br />75% of sex offenders released, the <br />1994 release was their "first release," <br />meaning their first discharge from <br />prison since being convicted and <br />sentenced to prison. <br />"First release" should not be confused <br />with first ever release from a prison. <br />"First release" pertains solely to the <br />sentence for the imprisonment offense <br />(as defined above). It does not pertain <br />to any earlier prison sentences offend- <br />ers may have served for some other <br />offense. <br />Attention is drawn to first releases <br />because certain statistics in the report <br />— for example, "average time served," <br />"percent of sentence served," "child <br />molester's age when he committed the <br />sex crime for which he was <br />imprisoned" — could only be computed <br />for those prisoners classified as first <br />releases. For such statistics, date first <br />admitted to prison for their imprison- <br />ment offense was needed. Since <br />prison records made available for the <br />study only provided this admission date <br />on first releases, first releases neces- <br />sarily formed the basis for the <br />statistics. <br />Prior arrest Statistics on prior arrests <br />were calculated using arrest dates <br />from the official criminal records of the <br />9,691 released sex offenders. Only <br />dates of arrest were counted, not the <br />number of arrest charges associated <br />with that arrest date. To illustrate, one <br />man was arrested on March 5, 1970, <br />and that one arrest resulted in 3 <br />separate arrest charges being filed <br />against him. In this study, that March 5 <br />arrest is considered one prior arrest. <br />Prior arrests were measured two differ- <br />ent ways in this report. The first way <br />did not include the imprisonment <br />offense for which the sex offender was <br />in prison in 1994. Prior arrest statistics <br />that did not include the imprisonment <br />offense are found in sections of the <br />report that describe the criminal <br />records of the 9,691 sex offenders at <br />the time of release from prison. In this <br />case, any arrest that had occurred on a <br />date prior to the sex offender's arrest <br />for his imprisonment offense was <br />considered a prior arrest. For example, <br />one released sex offender was found <br />to have four different dates of arrest <br />prior to the date of arrest for his impris- <br />onment offense. Those four arrests <br />resulted in 17 different charges being <br />brought against him. When describing <br />this released prisoner's criminal record, <br />he is considered to have four prior <br />arrests. <br />The second way of measuring prior <br />arrests did include the imprisonment <br />offense of the released sex offender. <br />Prior arrest statistics that did include <br />the imprisonment offense are found in <br />sections of the report that describe the <br />recidivism rates of the 9,691 sex <br />offenders following their release from <br />prison. In this case, any arrest that had <br />occurred on a date prior to the sex <br />offender's release from prison was <br />considered a prior arrest. By definition, <br />all 9,691 sex offenders had at least one <br />arrest prior to their release, which was <br />the sex crime arrest responsible for <br />their being in prison in 1994. This <br />means that the sex offender who was <br />arrested on four different dates prior to <br />the arrest for his imprisonment offense <br />under the first definition of prior arrest <br />was, under this second definition, <br />classified as having five prior arrests, <br />once his imprisonment offense is <br />included. <br />Thirteen tables in the report provide <br />statistics on prior arrests (and, in 2 of <br />the 13, prior convictions and prior <br />imprisonments). In tables 15, 16, 17, <br />18, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 36, and 37, <br />"prior arrests" includes the sex crime <br />arrest for the imprisonment offense; <br />these tables have the heading "prior to <br />1994 release." In tables 5 and 6, "prior <br />arrests" excludes that arrest; these <br />tables have the heading "prior to the <br />sex crime for which imprisoned." <br />In all tables, the same counting rule <br />was used: arrest dates, not arrest <br />charges, were counted to obtain the <br />number of prior arrests. <br />Rearrest Unless stated otherwise, this <br />recidivism measure is defined as the <br />number or percentage of released <br />prisoners who, within the first three <br />years following their 1994 release, <br />were arrested either in the same State <br />that released them (in this report those <br />arrests are called "in- State' arrests) or <br />in a different State (those arrests are <br />Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994 5 <br />