My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 - AB 1484 TRUE UP PROCESS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY (2012 - PRESENT)
>
2012
>
08/20/2012
>
2 - AB 1484 TRUE UP PROCESS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2012 4:54:59 PM
Creation date
8/16/2012 4:54:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
2
Date
8/20/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR <br />SUCCESSOR AGENCY <br />ACTION <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AUGUST 20, 2012 <br />TITLE: <br />AB 1484 TRUE UP PROCESS <br />CITY MANAGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />Receive and file. <br />DISCUSSION <br />CLERK OF THE COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />? As Recommended <br />? As Amended <br />? Implementing Resolution <br />? Other <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />On August 2, 2012, the City of Santa Ana acting as Successor Agency responded to the Orange <br />County Auditor-Controller's Office for a demand for payment in the amount of $1,160,097, and <br />complied with such request, stating our disagreement with the calculation. <br />The Department of Finance (DOF) considers the property tax increment revenues received by <br />the former redevelopment agencies from July 2011 through January 2012 as part of the <br />Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) that can be distributed to various taxing <br />entities. However, the RPTTF did not exist until February 1, 2012; the effective date of AB 1x 26. <br />DOF's calculation does not factor in the possibility that former redevelopment agencies may have <br />needed to utilize the tax increment revenues received during July 2011 through January 2012 to <br />make enforceable obligation payments due during the same period. <br />In addition, the Successor Agency is involved in pending litigation regarding various agreements <br />included on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) that DOF has disallowed as <br />enforceable obligations. The Successor Agency is still disputing DOF's decision, but has been <br />unsuccessful in engaging DOF in further dialogue to remedy the problem. Therefore, the <br />amounts approved by DOF on both the January to June 2012 and July to December 2012 ROPS <br />are not reflective of the true obligation amounts for each respective period. If the correct ROPS <br />amounts are used in the AB 1484 "True Up" process calculation, the County would have not <br />needed to demand the return of any prior tax increment revenues from the Successor Agency. <br />2-1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.