My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SA_FULL PACKET_2012-08-20
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY (2012 - PRESENT)
>
2012
>
08/20/2012
>
SA_FULL PACKET_2012-08-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2013 9:02:29 AM
Creation date
8/16/2012 5:21:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Date
8/20/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> REQUEST FOR <br /> <br /> SUCCESSOR AGENCY <br /> ACTION <br /> <br /> <br /> MEETING DATE: CLERK OF THE COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> AUGUST 20, 2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> TITLE: <br /> AB 1484 TRUE UP PROCESS ? As Recommended <br /> ? As Amended <br /> ? Implementing Resolution <br /> ? Other <br /> CONTINUED TO <br /> _c ! L Cam, FILE NUMBER <br /> <br /> CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br /> Receive and file. <br /> <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> <br /> On August 2, 2012, the City of Santa Ana acting as Successor Agency responded to the Orange <br /> County Auditor-Controller's Office for a demand for payment in the amount of $1,160,097, and <br /> complied with such request, stating our disagreement with the calculation. <br /> <br /> The Department of Finance (DOF) considers the property tax increment revenues received by <br /> the former redevelopment agencies from July 2011 through January 2012 as part of the <br /> Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) that can be distributed to various taxing <br /> entities. However, the RPTTF did not exist until February 1, 2012; the effective date of AB 1x 26. <br /> DOF's calculation does not factor in the possibility that former redevelopment agencies may have <br /> needed to utilize the tax increment revenues received during July 2011 through January 2012 to <br /> make enforceable obligation payments due during the same period. <br /> <br /> In addition, the Successor Agency is involved in pending litigation regarding various agreements <br /> included on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) that DOF has disallowed as <br /> enforceable obligations. The Successor Agency is still disputing DOF's decision, but has been <br /> unsuccessful in engaging DOF in further dialogue to remedy the problem. Therefore, the <br /> amounts approved by DOF on both the January to June 2012 and July to December 2012 ROPS <br /> are not reflective of the true obligation amounts for each respective period. If the correct ROPS <br /> amounts are used in the AB 1484 "True Up" process calculation, the County would have not <br /> needed to demand the return of any prior tax increment revenues from the Successor Agency. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 2-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.