My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
09/04/2012
>
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2016 1:46:24 PM
Creation date
8/30/2012 12:38:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31B
Date
9/4/2012
Destruction Year
2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />Discussion <br />Would the project: <br />Environmental Checklist <br />a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, <br />injilay, or death involving. <br />a1. Rupture ofa known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other- <br />substantial evidence ofa known farrlt?RefertoDivision of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 42, <br />Less - than - Significant Impact The Alquist - Priolo Act requires the California State Geologist to <br />identify areas in the state that are at risk from surface fault rupture. These areas are known as <br />Earthquake Fault Zones. As described in the Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared for the <br />proposed project (Appendix B), the project site is not located within a mapped Alquist- Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zone, and there are no known surface traces of any active, potentially active, or <br />inactive faults crossing through or extending toward the project site. The nearest fault zone is the <br />Newport Inglewood, which is associated with potentially active faults in the vicinity of Newport <br />Beach and the Los Angeles Basin and is located approximately 8.6 miles to the southwest of the <br />proposed project site (Appendix B). As a result, the potential for a surface rupture to occur at the <br />project site is low. Therefore, potential impacts related to rapture of a known earthquake fault are <br />less than significant. <br />a2. Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Less - than - Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Vl.al, the proposed <br />project is not located within or adjacent to a fault zone. However, because the proposed project is <br />located within a seismically active region, in fairly close proximity to several major active faults, the <br />project site is likely to experience strong ground shaking during the lifespan of the proposed project. <br />The Newport - Inglewood Fault Zone (8.6 miles distant) is of most concern to the project site. In <br />addition, the San Andreas (43 miles distant) and Raymond Faults (30 miles distant) are also <br />proximate and could affect Santa Ana (City of Santa Ana 1982). Earthquake intensities experienced <br />at the project site would vary depending upon the earthquake's magnitudes, distance between the <br />project site and the fault, and the types of materials underlying the project site. According to the <br />Land Use Element of the City's General plan, the greatest potential for earthquake damage is <br />expected to come frorn a large earthquake along the Newport - Inglewood fault. A magnitude 7 <br />earthquake along this fault would be expected to cause significant damage regionally. <br />In preparation of the Geotechnical Exploration Report, a site- specific evaluation of the peak ground <br />accelerations associated with the event having a 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years and <br />the maximum magnitude event on the fault system. Based on the site - specific ground motion <br />evaluation, the results of the analyses suggest that the site specific design Peak Horizontal Ground <br />Acceleration (PHGA) is approximately 0.38g based on the site - specific Maximum Considered <br />Earthquake (MCE) PHGA of 0.57g. The ground motions were determined using the site - specific <br />criteria per the 2010 CBC. In addition to this information, the Geotechnical Exploration Report <br />provides recommendations that have been developed based on the engineering properties of the <br />onsite soils and their anticipated behavior during and after construction. <br />The Academy Charter High School 12 <br />3 37 tune 20 <br />Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ICF 0092011 <br />31 B -113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.