My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
09/04/2012
>
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2016 1:46:24 PM
Creation date
8/30/2012 12:38:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31B
Date
9/4/2012
Destruction Year
2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana Environmental Checklist <br />control. The SWPPP is required to meet or exceed measures required by the Construction General <br />Permit. <br />In addition, the proposed project is required to prepare a NPDES post - construction stormwater <br />management plan in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) <br />and the City of Santa Ana Local Implementation Plan (LiP). The stormwater management plan must <br />include all applicable post - construction BMPs for this project. In addition to the implementation and <br />maintenance of BMPs, erosion would also be controlled by the landscaping proposed for the project <br />site. All of the site specific regulations and BMPs will be provided in a Water Quality Management <br />Plan (WQMP) to be implemented for post - construction operations of the project. <br />Compliance with existing state, regional, and local regulations, NPDES permit requirements, and <br />project- specific BMPs identified in the SWPPP, coupled with installation of landscaping and ongoing <br />maintenance and monitoring of construction and subsequent post - construction phase BMPs, would <br />ensure that project impacts with respect to topsoil loss and erosion would be less than significant. <br />c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result <br />of the project and potentially result in an on -site or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, <br />subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? <br />Less - than - Significant Innpact with Mitigation Incorporated. As described in response VLO, the <br />project site is located within an area identified as susceptible to liquefaction; however, the surface <br />manifestation of liquefaction is deemed unlikely. Exhibit 4 of the Seismic Safety Element of the City's <br />General Plan indicates that the project site is located within an area subject to subsidence. <br />Subsidence usually occurs as a result of excessive groundwater pumping or oil extraction. The <br />proposed project would not require groundwater pumping, nor would oil extraction occur as a <br />result of the proposed project. <br />For lateral spreading or flow failure to occur, a continuous, laterally unconstrained liquefiable zone <br />must be free to move along gently sloping ground toward an unconfined area. The project site is <br />relatively flat. Although the Santa Ana River channel and levee are located approximately 200 feet <br />south and east of the project site, the river channel near the site is concrete - lined, and the depth is <br />generally shallower than the soil layers at the project site deemed susceptible to liquefaction, and <br />thus would have no effect related to lateral spreading on or adjacent to the project site. Accordingly, <br />the potential for lateral spreading is deemed low (Appendix B). The proposed project would comply <br />with all CBC requirements. Additionally, as required in Mitigation Measure GEO -1, the proposed <br />project would comply with all geotechnicai recommendations provided in the Geotechnical <br />Exploration Report {Appendix B) to minimize potential impacts related to soils and geology. <br />Therefore, potential impacts related to unstable soils are less than significant with implementation <br />of Mitigation Measure GEO -1. <br />d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), <br />creating substantial risks to life or property? <br />Less - than - Significant Impact. Expansive soils are fine- grained soils (generally High plasticity clays) <br />that can undergo a significant increase in volume with an increase in water content and a significant <br />decrease in volume with a decrease in water content. Changes in the water content of an expansive <br />soil can result in severe distress to structures constructed upon the soil. The near surface soils at the <br />project site are generally granular with localized sandy silt to clay layers. Based on the geotechnicai <br />exploration report prepared for the proposed project, the near surface soils have low expansion <br />The Academy Charter High School 3 40 June 2012 <br />Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ICE 00414.11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.